Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28350011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Characterisation of male breast cancer: a descriptive biomarker study from a large patient series.

Matthew P Humphries, Sreekumar Sundara Rajan, Hedieh Honarpisheh, Gabor Cserni, Jo Dent, Laura Fulford, Lee B Jordan, J Louise Jones, Rani Kanthan, Maria Litwiniuk and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Exploring the One Health Paradigm in Male Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Matthew P HumphriesLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Sreekumar Sundara RajanLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Hedieh HonarpishehMD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, Texas, TX 77030, USA.
Gabor CserniDepartment of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Nyiri ut 38, H-6000, Kecskemet, Hungary.
Jo DentCalderdale Hospital, Halifax, HX3 0PW, UK.
Laura FulfordSurrey &Sussex NHS Trust, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 5RH, UK.
Lee B JordanUniversity of Dundee/NHS Tayside, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
J Louise JonesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Rani KanthanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada.
Maria LitwiniukPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, 02-004, Warsaw Poland.
Anna Di BenedettoDepartment of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute. Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Marcella MottoleseDepartment of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute. Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Elena ProvenzanoDepartment of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Sami ShoushaDepartment of Histopathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK.
Mark StephensUniversity Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on Trent, ST4 6QG, UK.
Janina Kulka2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út. 93, Budapest 1091, Hungary.
Ian O EllisFaculty of Medicine &Health Sciences, Nottingham City Hospital. Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Akinwale N TitloyeSchool of Medical Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Andrew M HanbyLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Abeer M ShaabanDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TW, UK.
Valerie SpeirsLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare. We assembled 446 MBCs on tissue microarrays and assessed clinicopathological information, together with data from 15 published studies, totalling 1984 cases. By immunohistochemistry we investigated 14 biomarkers (ERα, ERβ1, ERβ2, ERβ5, PR, AR, Bcl-2, HER2, p53, E-cadherin, Ki67, survivin, prolactin, FOXA1) for survival impact. The main histological subtype in our cohort and combined analyses was ductal (81%, 83%), grade 2; (40%, 44%), respectively. Cases were predominantly ERα (84%, 82%) and PR positive (74%, 71%), respectively, with HER2 expression being infrequent (2%, 10%), respectively. In our cohort, advanced age (>67) was the strongest predictor of overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) (p = 0.00001; p = 0.01, respectively). Node positivity negatively impacted DFS (p = 0.04). FOXA1 p = 0.005) and AR p = 0.009) were both positively prognostic for DFS, remaining upon multivariate analysis. Network analysis showed ERα, AR and FOXA1 significantly correlated. In summary, the principle phenotype of MBC was luminal A, ductal, grade 2. In ERα+ MBC, only AR had prognostic significance, suggesting AR blockade could be employed therapeutically.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast Neoplasms, MaleDisease-Free SurvivalEstrogen Receptor alphaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMalePhenotypePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, AndrogenBiomarkers, TumorEstrogen Receptor alphaFOXA1 protein, humanHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID28350011
PMCPMC5368596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.