ArticleScientific reports2017
Stability of R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping of the brain tissue in a large scale multi-center study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping heterogeneous region- and tissue-specific brain ageing patterns using quantitative MRI.Brain communications · 2026Article
- A dedicated phantom for exploring the interplay of fat and paramagnetic substances in quantitative susceptibility mapping.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- MRI R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping in brain tissue with extreme iron overload.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping as a Tool for Grading and Molecular Subtyping of Gliomas.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Feasibility and intra-and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping with radiomic features for intracranial dissecting intramural hematomas and atherosclerotic calcifications.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Quantifying Brain Iron in Hereditary Hemochromatosis Using R2* and Susceptibility Mapping.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Comparison of Phase Estimation Methods for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using a Rotating-Tube Phantom.Radiology research and practice · 2021Article
- Multiparametric MRI for Characterization of the Basal Ganglia and the Midbrain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- [Correlation of cardiovascular risk factors with brain iron deposition: A magnetic resonance imaging study].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2019Article
- Measurements of cerebral blood volume using quantitative susceptibility mapping, RNMR in biomedicine · 2019Article
- Clinical feasibility of brain quantitative susceptibility mapping.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2019Article
- Distinct progression pattern of susceptibility MRI in the substantia nigra of Parkinson's patients.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018Article
- Detection of vessel wall calcifications in vertebral arteries using susceptibility weighted imaging.Neuroradiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-center studies are advantageous for enrolling participants of varying pathological and demographical conditions, and especially in neurological studies. Hence stability of the obtained quantitative R2* and susceptibility in multicenter studies is a key issue for their widespread applications. In this work, the stabilities of simultaneously obtained R2* and susceptibility are investigated and compared across 10 sites that are equipped with the same scanner and receiver coil, the same post-processing process was used to achieve consistent experiment setup. Two healthy adult volunteers (one male and female) participated in this study. High intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained for both susceptibility (0.94) and R2* (0.96). The coefficients of variance for all measurements obtained were smaller than 0.1, the largest variations of measurements in all the chosen ROIs fall within ±20% from the median value. Higher level of stability was obtained in R2* as compared to susceptibility at 1 mm resolution (P < 0.05) and at 1.5 mm (P < 0.01).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.