Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28349947›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Patterns of correlation of facial shape with physiological measurements are more integrated than patterns of correlation with ratings.

S Windhager, F L Bookstein, E Millesi, B Wallner, K Schaefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S WindhagerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien, Austria.
F L BooksteinDepartment of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien, Austria.
E MillesiDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien, Austria.
B WallnerDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien, Austria.
K SchaeferDepartment of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article exploits a method recently incorporated in the geometric morphometric toolkit that complements previous approaches to quantifying the facial features associated with specific body characteristics and trait attribution during social perception. The new method differentiates more globally encoded from more locally encoded information by a summary scaling dimension that is estimated by fitting a line to the plot of log bending energy against log variance explained, partial warp by partial warp, for some sample of varying shapes. In the present context these variances come from the regressions of shape on some exogenous cause or effect of form. We work an example involving data from male faces. Here the regression slopes are steepest, and the sums of explained variances over the uniform component, partial warp 1 and partial warp 2 are greatest, for the conventional body mass index, followed by cortisol and, lastly, perceived health. This suggests that physiological characteristics may be represented at larger scale (global patterns), whereas cues in perception are of smaller scale (local patterns). Such a polarity within psychomorphospace, the global versus the focal, now has a metric by which patterns of morphology can be modeled in both biological and psychological studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexFaceFemaleHealth StatusHumansHydrocortisoneMalePhotographySalivaYoung AdultHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID28349947
PMCPMC5368612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.