Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28349269›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2017

Successful outcomes following transforaminal epidural steroid injections for C4/5 cervical disc prolapse associated with profound neurological deficit.

Adam Meir, Keith Bush

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam MeirThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK. adam.meir@btinternet.com.
Keith BushThe London Clinic, London, UK.
London Clinic · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo show that with C5 radiculopathy and profound neurological deficit, good outcomes can be obtained with injection therapy.

methodWe present two cases of cervical radiculopathy secondary to disc prolapse associated with profound neurological deficit. In both cases, cervical injection therapy was used as the primary management.

resultsThe two cases presented were both male, 59 and 36 years, and were diagnosed on MRI imaging with C4/5 disc prolapses. They presented with severe motor deficit and were both treated with foraminal epidural steroid injections, one of the patients also had two previous injections elsewhere prior to the first review. In both patients, pain and neurological deficit improved in a timely manner resulting in full recovery. MRI taken after recovery showed complete resorption of the disc prolapse in both cases.

conclusionIn C5 radiculopathy, even with severe neurological deficit, cervical injection therapy should be considered. These cases illustrate that excellent results can be obtained without the need for open surgery with its inherent risks.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeAdultGlucocorticoidsHumansInjections, EpiduralIntervertebral Disc DisplacementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiculopathyTreatment OutcomeTriamcinoloneGlucocorticoidsTriamcinoloneCervical spineDisc prolapseNeurological deficitRadiculopathyTransforaminal epidural

Identifiers

PMID28349269
OpenAlexW2599684537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.