Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28349219›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2018

Bacterial colonization in the apical part of extracted human teeth following root-end resection and filling: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

Igor Tsesis, Shlomo Elbahary, Nuphar Blau Venezia, Eyal Rosen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CLSM-Guided Imaging for Quantifying Endodontic Disinfection.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy of Endodontic Disinfection Protocols in anJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Igor TsesisDepartment of Endodontology, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shlomo ElbaharyDepartment of Endodontology, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nuphar Blau VeneziaDepartment of Endodontology, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eyal RosenDepartment of Endodontology, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel. Dr.eyalrosen@gmail.com.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate Enterococcus faecalis colonization at the apical part of root canals following root-end resection and filling using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe apical 3-mm root-ends of 55 extracted single rooted human teeth were resected, and 3-mm retrograde cavities were prepared and filled using either mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), intermediate restorative material (IRM), or Biodentine (n = 10 each); 25 teeth served as controls. The roots were placed in an experimental model, sterilized, and coronally filled with E. faecalis bacterial suspension for 21 days. Then, the apical 3-mm segments were cut to get two slabs (coronal and apical). The slabs were stained using LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit and evaluated using CLSM.

resultsThe fluorescence-stained areas were larger in the bucco-lingual directions compared with the mesio-distal directions (p < 0.05). The mean and maximal depths of bacterial colonization into the dentinal tubules were 755 and 1643 μm, respectively, with no differences between the root-end filling materials (p > 0.05). However, more live bacteria were found in the MTA group in comparison to IRM and Biodentine groups (p < 0.05).

conclusionsCLSM can be used to histologically demonstrate bacterial root-end colonization following root-end filling. This colonization at the filling-dentine interfaces and deeper into the dentinal tubules may be inhomogeneous, favoring the bucco-lingual aspects of the root. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Following root-end resection and filling bacterial colonization may lead to inflammatory reactions at the periapical tissues; the viability of the colonized bacteria may be affected by the type of root-end filling material.

Indexed as

Enterococcus faecalisMicroscopy, ConfocalRoot Canal TherapyAluminum CompoundsCalcium CompoundsColony Count, MicrobialDental Pulp CavityDentinDrug CombinationsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesOxidesRoot Canal Filling MaterialsSilicatesTooth ApexAluminum CompoundsCalcium CompoundsDrug Combinationsmineral trioxide aggregateOxidesRoot Canal Filling MaterialsSilicatesBacterial colonizationConfocal laser scanning microscopyEndodontic surgeryEnterococcus faecalisRoot-end filling

Identifiers

PMID28349219
OpenAlexW2599655832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.