Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28349191›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2018

A Risk-Based Ecohydrological Approach to Assessing Environmental Flow Regimes.

Glenn B Mcgregor, Jonathan C Marshall, Jaye S Lobegeiger, Dean Holloway, Norbert Menke, Julie Coysh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows.Environmental management · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glenn B McgregorQueensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. glenn.mcgregor@dsiti.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0084-4356
Jonathan C MarshallQueensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Jaye S LobegeigerQueensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Dean HollowayQueensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Norbert MenkeQueensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Julie CoyshQueensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For several decades there has been recognition that water resource development alters river flow regimes and impacts ecosystem values. Determining strategies to protect or restore flow regimes to achieve ecological outcomes is a focus of water policy and legislation in many parts of the world. However, consideration of existing environmental flow assessment approaches for application in Queensland identified deficiencies precluding their adoption. Firstly, in managing flows and using ecosystem condition as an indicator of effectiveness, many approaches ignore the fact that river ecosystems are subjected to threatening processes other than flow regime alteration. Secondly, many focus on providing flows for responses without considering how often they are necessary to sustain ecological values in the long-term. Finally, few consider requirements at spatial-scales relevant to the desired outcomes, with frequent focus on individual places rather than the regions supporting sustainability. Consequently, we developed a risk-based ecohydrological approach that identifies ecosystem values linked to desired ecological outcomes, is sensitive to flow alteration and uses indicators of broader ecosystem requirements. Monitoring and research is undertaken to quantify flow-dependencies and ecological modelling is used to quantify flow-related ecological responses over an historical flow period. The relative risk from different flow management scenarios can be evaluated at relevant spatial-scales. This overcomes the deficiencies identified above and provides a robust and useful foundation upon which to build the information needed to support water planning decisions. Application of the risk assessment approach is illustrated here by two case studies.

Indexed as

Conservation of Water ResourcesEcologyEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringModels, TheoreticalQueenslandRisk AssessmentRiversSustainable DevelopmentWater ResourcesChelodina longicollisEcologically sustainable developmentEnvironmental valuesPseudomugil signifierTrade-offsWater planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.