Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28349179›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2017

Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future.

Marcus J Schultz, Martin W Dunser, Arjen M Dondorp, Neill K J Adhikari, Shivakumar Iyer, Arthur Kwizera, Yoel Lubell, Alfred Papali, Luigi Pisani, Beth D Riviello and 30 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07167173 (Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
33.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07167173 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Predictive Model for Multidrug Resistance in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department With Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRan2025 to 2025Enrolled10,000ConditionsSepsis, Septic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors at 20 institutions in 17 countries.

Marcus J SchultzMahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. marcus.j.schultz@gmail.com.
Martin W DunserUniversity College of London Hospital, London, UK.
Arjen M DondorpMahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Neill K J AdhikariSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shivakumar IyerBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India.
Arthur KwizeraMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Yoel LubellDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center and University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alfred PapaliUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Luigi PisaniMahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Beth D RivielloBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Derek C AngusUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Luciano C AzevedoHospital Sirio-Libanes, Saõ Paulo, Brazil.
Tim BakerKarolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Janet V DiazCalifornia Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Emir FesticMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Rashan HaniffaMahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Randeep JawaStony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Shevin T JacobUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Niranjan KissoonBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Rakesh LodhaAll India Institute of Medical Science, Delhi, India.
Ignacio Martin-LoechesSt. James's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ganbold LundegMongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
David MisangoAga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mervyn MerJohannesburg Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sanjib MohantyIspat General Hospital, Sundargarh, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Srinivas MurthyBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Ndidiamaka MusaSeattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jane NakibuukaMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Ary Serpa NetoDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center and University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mai Nguyen Thi HoangOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Binh Nguyen ThienTrung Vuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Rajyabardhan PattnaikIspat General Hospital, Sundargarh, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Jason PhuaNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jacobus PrellerAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Pedro PovoaNova Medical School, CEDOC, New University of Lisbon and Hospital de Sao Francisco Xavier , Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
Suchitra RanjitAppolo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Daniel TalmorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonarthan ThevanayagamMzuzu Central Hospital, Mzuzu, Malawi.
C Louise ThwaitesNuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Mahidol University · THBritish Columbia Children's Hospital · CAIspat General Hospital · INMulago Hospital · UGUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAga Khan University Hospital Nairobi · KEAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBHarvard University · USHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital Sírio-Libanês · BRKarolinska Institutet · SEMayo Clinic in Florida · USMongolian National University of Medical Sciences · MNMzuzu University · MWNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a major reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, also in resource-poor settings. ICUs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges that could affect patient outcome.

aimTo describe differences between resource-poor and resource-rich settings regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, economics and research aspects of sepsis. We restricted this manuscript to the ICU setting even knowing that many sepsis patients in LMICs are treated outside an ICU.

findingsAlthough many bacterial pathogens causing sepsis in LMICs are similar to those in high-income countries, resistance patterns to antimicrobial drugs can be very different; in addition, causes of sepsis in LMICs often include tropical diseases in which direct damaging effects of pathogens and their products can sometimes be more important than the response of the host. There are substantial and persisting differences in ICU capacities around the world; not surprisingly the lowest capacities are found in LMICs, but with important heterogeneity within individual LMICs. Although many aspects of sepsis management developed in rich countries are applicable in LMICs, implementation requires strong consideration of cost implications and the important differences in resources.

conclusionsAddressing both disease-specific and setting-specific factors is important to improve performance of ICUs in LMICs. Although critical care for severe sepsis is likely cost-effective in LMIC setting, more detailed evaluation at both at a macro- and micro-economy level is necessary. Sepsis management in resource-limited settings is a largely unexplored frontier with important opportunities for research, training, and other initiatives for improvement.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth Care CostsAdultBiomedical ResearchChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisCritical CareDrug ResistanceGlobal Burden of DiseaseHealth ResourcesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicCritical careResource-limited settingsSepsis management

Identifiers

PMID28349179
OpenAlexW2601862041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.