ArticleIntensive care medicine2017
Understanding ethical decisions for patients on extracorporeal life support.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Should decision-making for cardiac arrest survivors be frailty-driven or frailty-informed?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- UK consensus statement on priorities to support the process of withdrawal of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Then and Now; Broadening Indications and Availability.Critical care clinics · 2023Review
- Discontinuation of ECMO-a review with a note on Indian scenario.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Review
- "Death as the One Great Certainty": ethical implications of children with irreversible cardiorespiratory failure and dependence on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications.Intensive care medicine · 2022Review
- Ethical Considerations in Ever-Expanding Utilization of ECLS: A Research Agenda.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Review
- A rational approach on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe hypoxemia: advanced technology is not a panacea.Annals of intensive care · 2021Review
- Ethical challenges of adult ECMO.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Review
- Extracorporeal life support for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive care medicine · 2020Review
- Provision of ECPR during COVID-19: evidence, equity, and ethical dilemmas.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 Interim Guidelines: A Consensus Document from an International Group of Interdisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Providers.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2020Article
- Planning and provision of ECMO services for severe ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic and other outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020Review
- Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2020Review
- Principlism and Personalism. Comparing Two Ethical Models Applied Clinically in Neonates Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Focus on extracorporeal life support.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
- [Organ assist devices in the future : Limits and perspectives].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.