Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348943›Full record

ArticleCureus2017

Correlation of IVC Diameter and Collapsibility Index With Central Venous Pressure in the Assessment of Intravascular Volume in Critically Ill Patients.

Abid Ilyas, Wasib Ishtiaq, Salman Assad, Haider Ghazanfar, Salman Mansoor, Muhammad Haris, Aayesha Qadeer, Aftab Akhtar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of inferior vena cava collapsibility and central venous pressure in assessing volume status in shocked patients.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Optimal management of brain-dead organ donor.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abid IlyasInternal Medicine, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Wasib IshtiaqDepartment of Pulmonology & Critical Care Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Salman AssadDepartment of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Haider GhazanfarDepartment of Neurology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Salman MansoorDepartment of Neurology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad HarisDepartment of Cardiology, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Aayesha QadeerDepartment of Pulmonology & Critical Care Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Aftab AkhtarDepartment of Pulmonology & Critical Care Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of our study is to assess the correlation between inferior vena cava (IVC) diameters, central venous pressure (CVP) and the IVC collapsibility index for estimating the volume status in critically ill patients.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used the convenient sampling of 100 adult medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients for a period of three months. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with an intrathoracic central venous catheter terminating in the distal superior vena cava connected to the transducer to produce a CVP waveform were included in the study. A Mindray diagnostic ultrasound system model Z6 ultrasound machine (Mindray, NJ, USA) was used for all examinations. An Ultrasonic Transducer model 3C5P (Mindray, NJ, USA) for IVC imaging was utilized. A paired sampled t-test was used to compute the p-values.

resultsA total of 32/100 (32%) females and 68/100 (68%) males were included in the study with a mean age of 50.4 ± 19.3 years. The mean central venous pressure maintained was 10.38 ± 4.14 cmH2O with an inferior vena cava collapsibility index of 30.68 ± 10.93. There was a statistically significant relation among the mean CVP pressure, the IVC collapsibility index, the mean maximum and minimum IVC between groups as determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between CVP and IVC collapsibility index (%), which was statistically significant (r = -0.827, n = 100, p < 0.0005). A strong positive correlation between CVP and maximum IVC diameter (r = 0.371, n = 100, p < 0.0005) and minimum IVC diameter (r = 0.572, n = 100, p < 0.0005) was found.

conclusionThere is a positive relationship of CVP with minimum and maximum IVC diameters but an inverse relationship with the IVC collapsibility index.

Indexed as

central venous pressurecollapsibility indexcritical careinferior vena cavaintensive care unitsultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID28348943
PMCPMC5346017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.