ArticlePeerJ2017
Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How quantitative is metabarcoding: A meta-analytical approach.Molecular ecology · 2019Pooled it
- Enhancing DNA recovery in low-biomass snow algae samples: a comparative study of extraction methods and their effect on community composition.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Dysbiosis of the enteric DNA virome correlates with the development of cachexia in a murine Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) model.Archives of virology · 2026Article
- Distance-decay reveals contrasting effects of land-use types on arthropod community homogenisation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Appalbees menu: a multiyear, multilocus metagenetic assessment of pollen foraging by AppalachianPeerJ · 2026Article
- Article
- MetaZooGene Intercalibration Experiment (MZG-ICE): Metabarcoding Marine Zooplankton Diversity of the Global Ocean.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Article
- Rapid DNA/eDNA-Based ID Tools for Improved Chondrichthyan Monitoring and Management.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Review
- Development of PCR Blocking Primers Enabling DNA Metabarcoding Analysis of Dietary Composition in Hematophagous Sea Lamprey.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Brute force prey metabarcoding to explore the diets of small invertebrates.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- A comparison of two gene regions for assessing community composition of eukaryotic marine microalgae from coastal ecosystems.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Signal and noise in metabarcoding data.PloS one · 2023Article
- A metabarcode based (species) inventory of the northern Adriatic phytoplankton.Biodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- The gut microbiome variability of a butterflyfish increases on severely degraded Caribbean reefs.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Review
- Strategies for molecular authentication of herbal products: from experimental design to data analysis.Chinese medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA metabarcoding, the PCR-based profiling of natural communities, is becoming the method of choice for biodiversity monitoring because it circumvents some of the limitations inherent to traditional ecological surveys. However, potential sources of bias that can affect the reproducibility of this method remain to be quantified. The interpretation of differences in patterns of sequence abundance and the ecological relevance of rare sequences remain particularly uncertain. Here we used one artificial mock community to explore the significance of abundance patterns and disentangle the effects of two potential biases on data reproducibility: indexed PCR primers and random sampling during Illumina MiSeq sequencing. We amplified a short fragment of the mitochondrial Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I (COI) for a single mock sample containing equimolar amounts of total genomic DNA from 34 marine invertebrates belonging to six phyla. We used seven indexed broad-range primers and sequenced the resulting library on two consecutive Illumina MiSeq runs. The total number of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) was ∼4 times higher than expected based on the composition of the mock sample. Moreover, the total number of reads for the 34 components of the mock sample differed by up to three orders of magnitude. However, 79 out of 86 of the unexpected OTUs were represented by <10 sequences that did not appear consistently across replicates. Our data suggest that random sampling of rare OTUs (e.g., small associated fauna such as parasites) accounted for most of variation in OTU presence-absence, whereas biases associated with indexed PCRs accounted for a larger amount of variation in relative abundance patterns. These results suggest that random sampling during sequencing leads to the low reproducibility of rare OTUs. We suggest that the strategy for handling rare OTUs should depend on the objectives of the study. Systematic removal of rare OTUs may avoid inflating diversity based on common
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.