Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348858›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2016

Quantitative assessment of insertion sequence impact on bacterial genome architecture.

Mark D Adams, Brian Bishop, Meredith S Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ISmLife · 2026
    Article
  2. AnResearch square · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the IS-capades ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of ISFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Annotation and Comparative Genomics of Prokaryotic Transposable Elements.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A curated collection ofGenome research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark D AdamsJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Brian BishopJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Meredith S WrightJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Capricorn Lane, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
J. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

The J. Craig Venter Institute Genome Center for Infectious DiseasesU19AI110819 · NIAID · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI TAN, GENE · 2014 to 2018
$29.7M
Evolution of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumanniiR01GM094403 · NIGMS · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ADAMS, MARK D · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110819NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion sequence (IS) elements are important mediators of genome plasticity and can lead to phenotypic changes with evolutionary significance. In multidrug-resistant

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiDNA Transposable ElementsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGenome, BacterialKlebsiella pneumoniaePhylogenyDNA Transposable ElementsAcinetobacter baumanniiantibiotic resistancegenome-wide analysisinsertion sequenceKlebsiella pneumoniaemobile genetic element

Identifiers

PMID28348858
PMCPMC5343135
OpenAlexW2339332745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.