Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348834›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2016

Genome-scale rates of evolutionary change in bacteria.

Sebastian Duchêne, Kathryn E Holt, François-Xavier Weill, Simon Le Hello, Jane Hawkey, David J Edwards, Mathieu Fourment, Edward C Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 183 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Investigating pathways of vancomycin-resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The island biology of the host microbiome.Trends in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic and patient epidemiology ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tick-associated microorganisms (Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sebastian Duchêne1​Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Kathryn E Holt2​Centre for Systems Genomics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
François-Xavier Weill4​Institut Pasteur, Unité des Bactéries Pathogènes Entériques, Paris 75015, France.
Simon Le Hello4​Institut Pasteur, Unité des Bactéries Pathogènes Entériques, Paris 75015, France.
Jane Hawkey2​Centre for Systems Genomics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
David J Edwards2​Centre for Systems Genomics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Mathieu Fourment1​Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Edward C Holmes1​Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating the rates at which bacterial genomes evolve is critical to understanding major evolutionary and ecological processes such as disease emergence, long-term host-pathogen associations and short-term transmission patterns. The surge in bacterial genomic data sets provides a new opportunity to estimate these rates and reveal the factors that shape bacterial evolutionary dynamics. For many organisms estimates of evolutionary rate display an inverse association with the time-scale over which the data are sampled. However, this relationship remains unexplored in bacteria due to the difficulty in estimating genome-wide evolutionary rates, which are impacted by the extent of temporal structure in the data and the prevalence of recombination. We collected 36 whole genome sequence data sets from 16 species of bacterial pathogens to systematically estimate and compare their evolutionary rates and assess the extent of temporal structure in the absence of recombination. The majority (28/36) of data sets possessed sufficient clock-like structure to robustly estimate evolutionary rates. However, in some species reliable estimates were not possible even with 'ancient DNA' data sampled over many centuries, suggesting that they evolve very slowly or that they display extensive rate variation among lineages. The robustly estimated evolutionary rates spanned several orders of magnitude, from approximately 10

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticBacteriaBiological EvolutionGenetic VariationGenome, BacterialMutationbacteriaevolutionmolecular clockphylogenysubstitution ratestime-dependency

Identifiers

PMID28348834
PMCPMC5320706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.