Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348574›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Proteome Profiling of Wheat Shoots from Different Cultivars.

Lam Dai Vu, Inge Verstraeten, Elisabeth Stes, Michiel Van Bel, Frederik Coppens, Kris Gevaert, Ive De Smet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lam Dai VuDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium; Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIBGhent, Belgium; Medical Biotechnology Center, VIBGhent, Belgium; Department of Biochemistry, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.
Inge VerstraetenDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium; Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIBGhent, Belgium.
Elisabeth StesDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium; Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIBGhent, Belgium; Medical Biotechnology Center, VIBGhent, Belgium; Department of Biochemistry, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.
Michiel Van BelDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium; Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIBGhent, Belgium.
Frederik CoppensDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium; Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIBGhent, Belgium.
Kris GevaertMedical Biotechnology Center, VIBGhent, Belgium; Department of Biochemistry, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.
Ive De SmetDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium; Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIBGhent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is a cereal grain and one of the world's major food crops. Recent advances in wheat genome sequencing are by now facilitating its genomic and proteomic analyses. However, little is known about possible differences in total protein levels of hexaploid versus tetraploid wheat cultivars, and also knowledge of phosphorylated wheat proteins is still limited. Here, we performed a detailed analysis of the proteome of seedling leaves from two hexaploid wheat cultivars (

Indexed as

leafmass spectrometryphosphoproteomeproteomewheat

Identifiers

PMID28348574
PMCPMC5346552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.