Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348524›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017

Recovery of Sentence Production Processes Following Language Treatment in Aphasia: Evidence from Eyetracking.

Jennifer E Mack, Michaela Nerantzini, Cynthia K Thompson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927302 (The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927302 nacompletednot on this map

The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsAphasia, Dysgraphia, Anomia, AgrammatismArmsTreatment Focusing on Naming Objects, Treatment Focusing on Improving Spelling Abilities, Treatment Focusing on Improving Sentence Processing, No Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurocognitive Recovery of Sentence Processing in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Review
  12. Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer E MackDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA.
Michaela NerantziniDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA.
Cynthia K ThompsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Department of Neurology, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
Neurolinguistic Investigations of Aphasia and RecoveryR01DC001948 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 1992 to 2021
$7.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

agrammatismaphasiaeyetrackinglanguage treatmentonline processingsentence production

Identifiers

PMID28348524
PMCPMC5346573
OpenAlexW2594460680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.