Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348505›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2017

Effects of a Pain Catastrophizing Induction on Sensory Testing in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.

Chloe J Taub, John A Sturgeon, Kevin A Johnson, Sean C Mackey, Beth D Darnall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chloe J TaubDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1336, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5467-9758
John A SturgeonDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1336, USA.
Kevin A JohnsonDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1336, USA.
Sean C MackeyDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1336, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-5348
Beth D DarnallDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1336, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-511X
Stanford University · US

Funding

Stanford CAM Center for Chronic Back PainP01AT006651 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2011 to 2018
$8.2M
Single Session Pain Catastrophizing Treatment: Comparative Efficacy & MechanismsR01AT008561 · NCCIH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DARNALL, BETH DENISE, MACKEY, SEAN C · 2015 to 2019
$3.9M
Neuroimaging and Mentoring in Translational Pain ResearchK24DA029262 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
Research Training Using TMS to Study Pain Processing in Long-Term Opioid UseK23DA031808 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KEVIN ANDREW · 2011 to 2015
$764k
NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT006651NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008561NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201200728PNIDA NIH HHS K23 DA031808NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain catastrophizing, a pattern of negative cognitive-emotional responses to actual or anticipated pain, maintains chronic pain and undermines response to treatments. Currently, precisely how pain catastrophizing influences pain processing is not well understood. In experimental settings, pain catastrophizing has been associated with amplified pain processing. This study sought to clarify pain processing mechanisms via experimental induction of pain catastrophizing. Forty women with chronic low back pain were assigned in blocks to an experimental condition, either a psychologist-led 10-minute pain catastrophizing induction or a control (10-minute rest period). All participants underwent a baseline round of several quantitative sensory testing (QST) tasks, followed by the pain catastrophizing induction or the rest period, and then a second round of the same QST tasks. The catastrophizing induction appeared to increase state pain catastrophizing levels. Changes in QST pain were detected for two of the QST tasks administered, weighted pin pain and mechanical allodynia. Although there is a need to replicate our preliminary results with a larger sample, study findings suggest a potential relationship between induced pain catastrophizing and central sensitization of pain. Clarification of the mechanisms through which catastrophizing affects pain modulatory systems may yield useful clinical insights into the treatment of chronic pain.

Indexed as

AdultCatastrophizationChronic PainFemaleHumansHyperalgesiaLow Back PainMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPilot ProjectsRandom AllocationSensation

Identifiers

PMID28348505
PMCPMC5350337
OpenAlexW2594655628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.