Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348494›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Prognostic value of site-specific metastases in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database analysis.

Hani Oweira, Ulf Petrausch, Daniel Helbling, Jan Schmidt, Meinrad Mannhart, Arianeb Mehrabi, Othmar Schöb, Anwar Giryes, Michael Decker, Omar Abdel-Rahman

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hani OweiraHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Ulf PetrauschHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Daniel HelblingHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Jan SchmidtHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Meinrad MannhartHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Arianeb MehrabiHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Othmar SchöbHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Anwar GiryesHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Michael DeckerHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Omar Abdel-RahmanHani Oweira, Anwar Giryes, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Swiss Cancer Institute, 6330 Cham, Switzerland.
Swiss Cancer Center Léman · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the prognostic value of site-specific metastases among patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma registered within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

methodsSEER database (2010-2013) has been queried through SEER*Stat program to determine the presentation, treatment outcomes and prognostic outcomes of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma according to the site of metastasis. In this study, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were classified according to the site of metastases (liver, lung, bone, brain and distant lymph nodes). We utilized chi-square test to compare the clinicopathological characteristics among different sites of metastases. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing for survival comparisons. We employed Cox proportional model to perform multivariate analyses of the patient population; and accordingly hazard ratios with corresponding 95%CI were generated. Statistical significance was considered if a two-tailed

resultsA total of 13233 patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer and known sites of distant metastases were identified in the period from 2010-2013 and they were included into the current analysis. Patients with isolated distant nodal involvement or lung metastases have better overall and pancreatic cancer-specific survival compared to patients with isolated liver metastases (for overall survival: lung

conclusionPancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with isolated liver metastases have worse outcomes compared to patients with isolated lung or distant nodal metastases. Further research is needed to identify the highly selected subset of patients who may benefit from local treatment of the primary tumor and/or metastatic disease.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAge FactorsChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisBone metastasesLiver metastasesLung metastasesPancreatic cancerSurveillance Epidemiology and End Results database

Identifiers

PMID28348494
PMCPMC5352929
OpenAlexW2596418178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.