ArticleDisease markers2017
A Novel Panel of Serum Biomarkers for MPM Diagnosis.
Article in Disease markers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of combination of biomarkers for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical utility of diagnostic biomarkers in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Pooled it
- Global bibliometric analysis of pleural mesothelioma biomarkers (2002-2024): trends and emerging frontiers.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Pleural Mesothelioma: Advances in Blood and Pleural Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Role of Prosaposin and Extracellular Sulfatase Sulf-1 Detection in Pleural Effusions as Diagnostic Biomarkers of Malignant Mesothelioma.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- The National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network: Two Decades of Progress.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Review
- Challenges and Opportunities in Clinical Applications of Blood-Based Proteomics in Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
- Circulating Epigenetic Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State of the Art and critical Evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Comparison of serum biochemical markers in patients with mesothelioma and pleural plaques versus healthy individuals exposed to environmental asbestos.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2019Article
- Quantitative Comparative Proteomics Reveal Biomarkers for Dengue Disease Severity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Breath analysis as a diagnostic and screening tool for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review.Translational lung cancer research · 2018Review
- Prediagnostic detection of mesothelioma by circulating calretinin and mesothelin - a case-control comparison nested into a prospective cohort of asbestos-exposed workers.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Serum mesothelin and other biomarkers: what have we learned in the last decade?Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Biomarkers in the prevention and follow-up of workers exposed to asbestos.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for malignant mesothelioma: an update.Translational lung cancer research · 2017Review
- Putative Biomarkers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Suggested by Proteomic Analysis of Cell Secretome.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure to asbestos is the main cause of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a highly aggressive cancer of the pleura. Since the only tools for early detection are based on radiological tests, some authors focused on serum markers (i.e., mesothelin). The aim of this study was the evaluation of new serum biomarkers to be used individually or in combination, in order to improve the outcome of patients whose disease would be diagnosed at an earlier stage. Serum and plasma were available from 43 subjects previously exposed to asbestos and 27 MPM patients, all being epithelioid type. All the new markers found differentially expressed in MPM and healthy subjects, by proteomic and genomic approaches, have been validated in the serum by the use of specific ELISA. The combined approach, using tools of genomics and proteomics, is found to be highly innovative for this type of disease and led to the identification of new serum markers in the diagnosis of MPM. These results, if confirmed in a larger series, may have a strong impact in this area, because early detection of this cancer in people at high risk could significantly improve the course of the disease and the clinical approach to an individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.