Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Cooperation and competition shape ecological resistance during periodic spatial disturbance of engineered bacteria.

Cortney E Wilson, Allison J Lopatkin, Travis J A Craddock, William W Driscoll, Omar Tonsi Eldakar, Jose V Lopez, Robert P Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cortney E WilsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314, USA.
Allison J LopatkinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Travis J A CraddockClinical Systems Biology Group, Institute for Neuro-Immune Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314, USA.
William W DriscollDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Omar Tonsi EldakarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314, USA.
Jose V LopezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314, USA.
Robert P SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314, USA. rsmith@nova.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperation is fundamental to the survival of many bacterial species. Previous studies have shown that spatial structure can both promote and suppress cooperation. Most environments where bacteria are found are periodically disturbed, which can affect the spatial structure of the population. Despite the important role that spatial disturbances play in maintaining ecological relationships, it remains unclear as to how periodic spatial disturbances affect bacteria dependent on cooperation for survival. Here, we use bacteria engineered with a strong Allee effect to investigate how the frequency of periodic spatial disturbances affects cooperation. We show that at intermediate frequencies of spatial disturbance, the ability of the bacterial population to cooperate is perturbed. A mathematical model demonstrates that periodic spatial disturbance leads to a tradeoff between accessing an autoinducer and accessing nutrients, which determines the ability of the bacteria to cooperate. Based on this relationship, we alter the ability of the bacteria to access an autoinducer. We show that increased access to an autoinducer can enhance cooperation, but can also reduce ecological resistance, defined as the ability of a population to resist changes due to disturbance. Our results may have implications in maintaining stability of microbial communities and in the treatment of infectious diseases.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyMicrobial ConsortiaMicrobial InteractionsQuorum SensingBacteriaModels, TheoreticalSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28348396
PMCPMC5428654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.