Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348253›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.

Alexander G Fletcher, Fergus Cooper, Ruth E Baker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biophysics of lumen morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Three-dimensional cellular dynamics and mandibular morphogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spectral approaches to stress relaxation in epithelial monolayers.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Shaping epithelial lumina under pressure.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander G FletcherSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK a.g.fletcher@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-4336
Fergus CooperMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Ruth E BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic epithelia achieve complex morphogenetic movements, including in-plane reshaping, bending and folding, through the coordinated action and rearrangement of individual cells. Technical advances in molecular and live-imaging studies of epithelial dynamics provide a very real opportunity to understand how cell-level processes facilitate these large-scale tissue rearrangements. However, the large datasets that we are now able to generate require careful interpretation. In combination with experimental approaches, computational modelling allows us to challenge and refine our current understanding of epithelial morphogenesis and to explore experimentally intractable questions. To this end, a variety of cell-based modelling approaches have been developed to describe cell-cell mechanical interactions, ranging from vertex and 'finite-element' models that approximate each cell geometrically by a polygon representing the cell's membrane, to immersed boundary and subcellular element models that allow for more arbitrary cell shapes. Here, we review how these models have been used to provide insights into epithelial morphogenesis and describe how such models could help future efforts to decipher the forces and mechanical and biochemical feedbacks that guide cell and tissue-level behaviour. In addition, we discuss current challenges associated with using computational models of morphogenetic processes in a quantitative and predictive way.This article is part of the themed issue 'Systems morphodynamics: understanding the development of tissue hardware'.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputational BiologyEpitheliumModels, Biologicalcomputational modellingepithelial morphogenesisfinite-element modelimmersed boundary methodsubcellular element model

Identifiers

PMID28348253
PMCPMC5379025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.