Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348252›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Mechanical design in embryos: mechanical signalling, robustness and developmental defects.

Lance A Davidson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Enigmas of Tissue Closure: Inspiration fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evidence that tissue recoil in the earlyMolecular biology of the cell · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The revolutionary developmental biology of Wilhelm His, Sr.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Developmental origins of mechanical homeostasis in the aorta.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lance A DavidsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA lad43@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2956-0437

Funding

The Biomechanics of morphogenesis in the frogR01HD044750 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI DAVIDSON, LANCE A. · 2005 to 2020
$3.8M
Mechanical Control of Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial TransitionR56HL134195 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DAVIDSON, LANCE A. · 2016 to 2016
$550k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL134195NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryos are shaped by the precise application of force against the resistant structures of multicellular tissues. Forces may be generated, guided and resisted by cells, extracellular matrix, interstitial fluids, and how they are organized and bound within the tissue's architecture. In this review, we summarize our current thoughts on the multiple roles of mechanics in direct shaping, mechanical signalling and robustness of development. Genetic programmes of development interact with environmental cues to direct the composition of the early embryo and endow cells with active force production. Biophysical advances now provide experimental tools to measure mechanical resistance and collective forces during morphogenesis and are allowing integration of this field with studies of signalling and patterning during development. We focus this review on concepts that highlight this integration, and how the unique contributions of mechanical cues and gradients might be tested side by side with conventional signalling systems. We conclude with speculation on the integration of large-scale programmes of development, and how mechanical responses may ensure robust development and serve as constraints on programmes of tissue self-assembly.This article is part of the themed issue 'Systems morphodynamics: understanding the development of tissue hardware'.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentMorphogenesisAnimalsBiomechanical Phenomenabiomechanicsdevelopmental defectmechanobiologymorphogenesisorganogenesisself-assembly

Identifiers

PMID28348252
PMCPMC5379024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.