Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348193›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Determinants of second pregnancy among pregnant women: a hospital-based cross-sectional survey in China.

Xianglong Xu, Hanxiao Zuo, Zumin Shi, Yunshuang Rao, LianLian Wang, Huan Zeng, Lei Zhang, Manoj Sharma, Cesar Reis, Yong Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Short-term clinical outcomes of neonates of secundiparous mothers: a single-center cohort study].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Xianglong XuSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hanxiao ZuoSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zumin ShiFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3099-3299
Yunshuang RaoSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
LianLian WangThe Department of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Huan ZengSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lei ZhangResearch Center for Public Health, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Manoj SharmaDepartment of Behavioral and Environmental Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, UK.
Cesar ReisDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Yong ZhaoSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chongqing Public Health Medical Center · CNChongqing Medical University · CNLoma Linda University Medical Center · USMelbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNThe University of Adelaide · AUWalden University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to explore determinants of second pregnancy and underlying reasons among pregnant Chinese women.

designThe study was a population-based cross-sectional survey.

setting16 hospitals in 5 provinces of Mainland China were included.

participantsA total of 2345 pregnant women aged 18 years or above were surveyed face to face by investigators between June and August 2015.

main outcome measuresThe pregnancy statuses (first or second pregnancy) and reasons for entering second pregnancy.

resultsA total of 1755 (74.8%) and 590 (25.2%) women in their respective first and second pregnancies were enrolled in this study. The most common self-reported reasons for entering second pregnancy among participants included the benefits to the first child (26.1%), love of children (25.8%), adoption of the 2-child policy (11.5%), concerns about losing the first child (7.5%) and suggestions from parents (7.5%). Pregnant women with low (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.96; 95% CI 1.62 to 2.36) and moderate education level (PR 1.97; 95% CI 1.65 to 2.36) were more likely to have a second pregnancy than their higher educated counterparts. Income was inversely associated with second pregnancy. However, unemployed participants (PR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.95) were less likely to enter a second pregnancy than those employed. Women with moderate education were 3 times more likely to have a second child following the '2-child policy' than the low education level subgroup.

conclusions1 in every 4 pregnant women is undergoing a second pregnancy. The benefits of the firstborn or the love of children were the key drivers of a second pregnancy. Low socioeconomic status was positively associated with a second pregnancy as well. The new 2-child policy will have an influence on China's demographics.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsPregnant PeopleAdultBirth RateChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEconomic DevelopmentFamilyFamily Planning PolicyFemaleHumansMalePopulation ControlPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsEPIDEMIOLOGYPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINESOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID28348193
PMCPMC5372152
OpenAlexW2603479364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.