Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348182›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of level of constraint on postoperative outcome.

Hagen Hommel, Kai Wilke, Daniel Kunze, Peggy Hommel, Peter Fennema

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hagen HommelKrankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH BT Wriezen, Klinik für Orthopädie, Sportmedizin und Rehabilitation, Wriezen, Germany.
Kai WilkeKrankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH BT Wriezen, Klinik für Orthopädie, Sportmedizin und Rehabilitation, Wriezen, Germany.
Daniel KunzeKrankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH BT Wriezen, Klinik für Orthopädie, Sportmedizin und Rehabilitation, Wriezen, Germany.
Peggy HommelKrankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH BT Wriezen, Klinik für Orthopädie, Sportmedizin und Rehabilitation, Wriezen, Germany.
Peter FennemaAMR Advanced Medical Research GmbH, Männedorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3549-398X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe proper management of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with severe deformities regarding the preferable prosthetic design and the required amount of constraint is a controversial subject. In the absence of any high-level clinical evidence, we designed a randomised clinical trial to investigate if rotating hinged (RTH) and constrained condylar knee (CCK) designs yield similar outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre, randomised clinical trial including two groups of 85 patients. Patients will be randomised to a CCK knee design group or an RTH knee design group. Patients will be followed for 2 years. The study will be designed as an equivalence trial. The primary study outcome will be the postoperative functional outcome as measured by the self-administered Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Secondary outcomes will be postoperative joint awareness during various activities of daily living as measured by the Forgotten Joint Score-12, the Knee Society Score, along with the incidence and location of radiolucent lines using the Knee Society TKA radiographic evaluation system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the ethics committee of the Landesärztekammer Brandenburg ((S 10(a)/2013) from 27.08.2013, amended on 25.04.2016) and will be conducted according to the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and the ISO14155:2011. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00010539.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRadiographyActivities of Daily LivingAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansIncidenceJoint InstabilityKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleOsteoarthritis, KneePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Periodarthroplasty, knee replacementclinical equivalencyOsteoarthritis, kneetrials, randomized clinical

Identifiers

PMID28348182
PMCPMC5372033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.