Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28348060›Full record

ArticleGenetics2017

GeneImp: Fast Imputation to Large Reference Panels Using Genotype Likelihoods from Ultralow Coverage Sequencing.

Athina Spiliopoulou, Marco Colombo, Peter Orchard, Felix Agakov, Paul McKeigue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Imputation of ancient canid genomes reveals inbreeding history over the past 10,000 years.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Imputation of ancient human genomes.Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Best practices for analyzing imputed genotypes from low-pass sequencing in dogs.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. An autoencoder-based deep learning method for genotype imputation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Athina SpiliopoulouCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United Kingdom.
Marco ColomboCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United Kingdom.
Peter OrchardPharmatics Ltd., Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, United Kingdom.
Felix AgakovPharmatics Ltd., Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, United Kingdom.
Paul McKeigueCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United Kingdom paul.mckeigue@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800604Medical Research Council MR/K015346/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We address the task of genotype imputation to a dense reference panel given genotype likelihoods computed from ultralow coverage sequencing as inputs. In this setting, the data have a high-level of missingness or uncertainty, and are thus more amenable to a probabilistic representation. Most existing imputation algorithms are not well suited for this situation, as they rely on prephasing for computational efficiency, and, without definite genotype calls, the prephasing task becomes computationally expensive. We describe GeneImp, a program for genotype imputation that does not require prephasing and is computationally tractable for whole-genome imputation. GeneImp does not explicitly model recombination, instead it capitalizes on the existence of large reference panels-comprising thousands of reference haplotypes-and assumes that the reference haplotypes can adequately represent the target haplotypes over short regions unaltered. We validate GeneImp based on data from ultralow coverage sequencing (0.5×), and compare its performance to the most recent version of BEAGLE that can perform this task. We show that GeneImp achieves imputation quality very close to that of BEAGLE, using one to two orders of magnitude less time, without an increase in memory complexity. Therefore, GeneImp is the first practical choice for whole-genome imputation to a dense reference panel when prephasing cannot be applied, for instance, in datasets produced via ultralow coverage sequencing. A related future application for GeneImp is whole-genome imputation based on the off-target reads from deep whole-exome sequencing.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenome, HumanGenotypeSoftwareAlgorithmsGene FrequencyHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAGeneImpgenotype imputationgenotype likelihoodimputation from genotype likelihoodsno prephasingphasing

Identifiers

PMID28348060
PMCPMC5419496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.