Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28347984›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Trends in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: repeated primary care survey in South West England.

Natasha Mejzner, Christopher E Clark, Lindsay Fp Smith, John L Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Waking up to wearables: the next era of blood pressure measurement for primary care?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding measurement of postural hypotension: a nationwide survey of general practice in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hypertension and hypotension: getting the balance right.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension-related workload: an interrupted time series analysis in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natasha MejznerPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon.
Christopher E ClarkPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon.
Lindsay Fp SmithEast Somerset Research Consortium, Westlake Surgery, Yeovil, Somerset.
John L CampbellPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon.
Exeter Primary Care · GBAndries Vosloo Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious surveys identified a shift to nurse-led care in hypertension in 2010. In 2011 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended ambulatory (ABPM) or home (HBPM) blood pressure (BP) monitoring for diagnosis of hypertension.

aimTo survey the organisation of hypertension care in 2016 to identify changes, and to assess uptake of NICE diagnostic guidelines. DESIGN AND

settingQuestionnaires were distributed to all 305 general practices in South West England.

methodResponses were compared with previous rounds (2007 and 2010). Data from the 2015 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) were used to compare responders with non-responders, and to explore associations of care organisation with QOF achievement.

resultsOne-hundred-and-seventeen practices (38%) responded. Responders had larger list sizes and greater achievement of the QOF target BP ≤150/90 mmHg. Healthcare assistants (HCAs) now monitor BP in 70% of practices, compared with 37% in 2010 and 19% in 2007 (

conclusionIn primary care BP monitoring has devolved from GPs and nurses to HCAs. One in 10 practices are not implementing NICE guidelines on ABPM and HBPM for diagnosis of hypertension. Most practices express confidence interpreting HBPM results but less so with ABPM. The need for education and quality assurance for allied health professionals is highlighted, and for training in ABPM interpretation for GPs.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelAnalysis of VarianceBlood Pressure DeterminationCommunity Pharmacy ServicesEnglandGeneral PracticeHumansHypertensionNurse PractitionersOutcome Assessment, Health CarePharmacistsPractice Patterns, Nurses'Rural HealthUrban Healthblood pressure determinationhypertensioninter-arm differenceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID28347984
PMCPMC5409425
OpenAlexW2597809284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.