Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28347618›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Implementation of Hysterectomy Pathway: Impact on Complications.

Faina Linkov, Amin Sanei-Moghaddam, Robert P Edwards, Paula J Lounder, Naveed Ismail, Sharon L Goughnour, Chaeryon Kang, Suketu M Mansuria, John T Comerci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hysterectomy Route for Benign Conditions.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Faina LinkovMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Linkfy@mail.magee.edu.
Amin Sanei-MoghaddamMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert P EdwardsDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paula J LounderPayer Provider Programs, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Naveed IsmailPayer Provider Programs, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sharon L GoughnourMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Chaeryon KangDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Suketu M MansuriaDivisions of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John T ComerciDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Alveolar DevMAPU01HL122626 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI AMBALAVANAN, NAMASIVAYAM, HAGOOD, JAMES S. · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL122626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States. For women who need hysterectomy, it is important to ensure that minimally invasive hysterectomy procedures are used appropriately to reduce surgical complications and improve value of care. Although we previously demonstrated a reduction in total abdominal hysterectomy rates after the implementation of hysterectomy pathway treatment algorithm in 2012, this study focuses on exploring the effect of pathways implementation on surgical outcomes.

methodsAll retrospective medical records for hysterectomy surgeries performed for benign indications at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center hospitals between the fiscal years (FY) 2012 and 2014 were identified. We analyzed the health care outcomes by route of surgery and year using Χ

resultsA total of 6,569 hysterectomies for benign indications were performed between FY 2012 and 2014. In FY 2012, 1,154 patients (59.15%) had a length of stay of 1 day or less, whereas in FY 2014 this number increased to 1,791 (74.53%; p < .0001). Within 3 years of implementing the pathway, surgical site infections had a reduction of 47%, with a considerable trend toward significance (p = .067).

conclusionsImplementation of hysterectomy pathway has been associated with reduction of surgical complications in benign hysterectomy settings. Implementation of clinical pathways offers an opportunity for improving patient outcomes that should be investigated in various health care settings and across procedures.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysAdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPennsylvaniaPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28347618
PMCPMC9089362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.