Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28347293›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Comparison of a novel microcrystalline tyrosine adjuvant with aluminium hydroxide for enhancing vaccination against seasonal influenza.

M D Heath, N J Swan, A C Marriott, N J Silman, B Hallis, C Prevosto, K E Gooch, M A Skinner

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M D HeathAllergy Therapeutics Ltd, Dominion Way, West Sussex, BN14 8SA, UK. matthew.heath@allergytherapeutics.com.
N J SwanAllergy Therapeutics Ltd, Dominion Way, West Sussex, BN14 8SA, UK.
A C MarriottPublic Health England, PHE Porton, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
N J SilmanPublic Health England, PHE Porton, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
B HallisPublic Health England, PHE Porton, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
C PrevostoPublic Health England, PHE Porton, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
K E GoochPublic Health England, PHE Porton, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
M A SkinnerAllergy Therapeutics Ltd, Dominion Way, West Sussex, BN14 8SA, UK.
Public Health England · GBAllergy Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination against seasonal influenza strains is recommended for "high risk" patient groups such as infants, elderly and those with respiratory or circulatory diseases. However, efficacy of the trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) is poor in many cases and in the event of an influenza pandemic, mono-valent vaccines have been rapidly developed and deployed. One of the main issues with use of vaccine in pandemic situations is the lack of a suitable quantity of vaccine early enough during the pandemic to exert a major influence on the transmission of virus and disease outcome. One approach is to use a dose-sparing regimen which inevitably involves enhancing the efficacy using adjuvants.

methodsIn this study we compare the use of a novel microcrystalline tyrosine (MCT) adjuvant, which is currently used in a niche area of allergy immunotherapy, for its ability to enhance the efficacy of a seasonal TIV preparation. The efficacy of the MCT adjuvant formulation was compared to alum adjuvanted TIV and to TIV administered without adjuvant using a ferret challenge model to determine vaccine efficacy.

resultsThe MCT was found to possess high protein-binding capacity. In the two groups where TIV was formulated with adjuvant, the immune response was found to be higher (as determined by HAI titre) than vaccine administered without adjuvant and especially so after challenge with a live influenza virus. Vaccinated animals exhibited lower viral loads (as determined using RT-PCR) than control animals where no vaccine was administered.

conclusionsThe attributes of each adjuvant in stimulating single-dose protection against a poorly immunogenic vaccine was demonstrated. The properties of MCT that lead to the reported effectiveness warrants further exploration in this and other vaccine targets - particularly where appropriate immunogenic, biodegradable and stable alternative adjuvants are sought.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAnimalsCrystallizationDogsDrug CompoundingDrug SynergismFerretsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMicrospheresOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSeasonsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideInfluenza VaccinesTyrosineAdjuvantAluminumFerretInfluenzaMicrocrystalline tyrosineVaccine

Identifiers

PMID28347293
PMCPMC5369220
OpenAlexW2603561916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.