Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28347283›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2017

Healthcare resource use and costs of multiple sclerosis patients in Germany before and during fampridine treatment.

Tjalf Ziemssen, Christine Prosser, Jennifer Scarlet Haas, Andrew Lee, Sebastian Braun, Pamela Landsman-Blumberg, Angela Kempel, Erika Gleißner, Sarita Patel, Ming-Yi Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Complex intervention for MS patients in Germany - can it be cost-saving for the society?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tjalf ZiemssenUniversitätsklinium Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Christine ProsserXcenda GmbH, Lange Laube 31, D-30159, Hannover, Germany.
Jennifer Scarlet HaasXcenda GmbH, Lange Laube 31, D-30159, Hannover, Germany. jennifer.haas@xcenda.de.
Andrew LeeBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sebastian BraunXcenda GmbH, Lange Laube 31, D-30159, Hannover, Germany.
Pamela Landsman-BlumbergXcenda LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Angela KempelBiogen GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Ring 6, 85737, Ismaning, Germany.
Erika GleißnerBiogen GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Ring 6, 85737, Ismaning, Germany.
Sarita PatelBiogen GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Ring 6, 85737, Ismaning, Germany.
Ming-Yi HuangBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Biogen (Germany) · DEBiogen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) patients often suffer from gait impairment and fampridine is indicated to medically improve walking ability in this population. Patient characteristics, healthcare resource use, and costs of MS patients on fampridine treatment for 12 months in Germany were analyzed.

methodsA retrospective claims database analysis was conducted including MS patients who initiated fampridine treatment (index date) between July 2011 and December 2013. Continuous insurance enrollment during 12 months pre- and post-index date was required, as was at least 1 additional fampridine prescription in the fourth quarter after the index date. Patient characteristics were evaluated and pre- vs post-index MS-related healthcare utilization and costs were compared.

resultsA total of 562 patients were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 50.5 (9.8) years and 63% were female. In the treatment period, almost every patient had at least 1 MS-related outpatient visit, 24% were hospitalized due to MS, and 79% utilized MS-specific physical therapy in addition to the fampridine treatment. Total MS-related healthcare costs were significantly higher in the fampridine treatment period than in the period prior to fampridine initiation (€17,392 vs €10,960, P < 0.001). While this difference was driven primarily by prescription costs, MS-related inpatient costs were lower during fampridine treatment (€1,333 vs €1,565, P < 0.001).

conclusionsPhysical therapy is mainly used concomitant to fampridine treatment. While healthcare costs were higher during fampridine treatment compared to the pre-treatment period, inpatient costs were lower. Further research is necessary to better understand the fampridine influence.

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineAdultFemaleGermanyHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPatient Acceptance of Health CarePotassium Channel BlockersRetrospective Studies4-AminopyridinePotassium Channel BlockersClaims dataFampridineGermanyMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID28347283
PMCPMC5369011
OpenAlexW2601098597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.