Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28347278›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2017

Validity of anthropometric equations to estimate infant fat mass at birth and in early infancy.

Jennifer S Cauble, Mira Dewi, Holly R Hull

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Body adiposity and oral feeding outcomes in infants: a pilot study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Maternal dietary fat intake during pregnancy and newborn body composition.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic flexibility during late pregnancy is associated with neonatal adiposity.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2021
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer S CaubleDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow BLVD, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Mira DewiDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow BLVD, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Holly R HullDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow BLVD, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. hhull@kumc.edu.
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Kansas BIRCWH Career Development Program Women's HealthK12HD052027 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, SUSAN E · 2005 to 2014
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052027NICHD NIH HHS L30 HD073930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn newborns and children, body fat estimation equations are often used at different ages than the age used to develop the equations. Limited validation studies exist for newborn body fat estimation equations at birth or later in infancy. The study purpose was to validate 4 newborn fat mass (FM) estimation equations in comparison to FM measured by air displacement plethysmography (ADP; the Pea Pod) at birth and 3 months.

methodsNinety-five newborns (1-3 days) had their body composition measured by ADP and anthropometrics assessed by skinfolds. Sixty-three infants had repeat measures taken (3 months). FM measured by ADP was compared to FM from the skinfold estimation equations (Deierlein, Catalano, Lingwood, and Aris). Paired t-tests assessed mean differences, linear regression assessed accuracy, precision was assessed by R

resultsAt birth, FM measured by ADP differed from FM estimated by Deierlein, Lingwood and Aris equations, but did not differ from the Catalano equation. At 3 months, FM measured by ADP was different from all equations. At both time points, poor precision and accuracy was detected. Bias was detected in most all equations.

conclusionsPoor agreement, precision, and accuracy were found between prediction equations and the criterion at birth and 3 months.

Indexed as

AdiposityBody Weights and MeasuresFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsMalePlethysmographySkinfold ThicknessADPAnthropometricsFat massInfantPrediction equationsSkinfolds

Identifiers

PMID28347278
PMCPMC5368988
OpenAlexW2597932435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.