Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28346796›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2017

Deborah L Dorcemus, Eve O George, Caroline N Dealy, Syam P Nukavarapu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. iScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah L Dorcemus1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut , Storrs, Connecticut.
Eve O George2 Institute for Regenerative Engineering, UCONN Health , Farmington, Connecticut.
Caroline N Dealy3 Center for Regenerative Medicine and Skeletal Development, Department of Reconstructive Sciences, UCONN Health , Farmington, Connecticut.
Syam P Nukavarapu1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut , Storrs, Connecticut.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, engineered structures have been developed for osteochondral (OC) tissue regeneration. While the optimal structure design is yet to be determined, these scaffolds require in vitro evaluation before clinical use. However, the means by which complex scaffolds, such as OC scaffolds, can be tested are limited. Taking advantage of a mesenchymal stem cell's (MSC's) ability to respond to its surrounding we harness external cues, such as the cell's mechanical environment and delivered factors, to create an in vitro culture system for OC tissue engineering with a single cell source on a gradient yet integrated scaffold system. To do this, the effect of hydrogel stiffness on the expression of human MSCs (hMSCs) chondrogenic differentiation was studied using histological analysis. Additionally, hMSCs were also cultured in different combinations of chondrogenic and osteogenic media to develop a co-differentiation media suitable for OC lineage differentiation. A uniquely graded (density-gradient matrix) OC scaffold with a distal cartilage hydrogel phase specifically tailored to support chondrogenic differentiation was cultured using a newly developed "simulated in vivo culture method." The scaffold's culture in co-differentiation media models hMSC infiltration into the scaffold and subsequent differentiation into the distal cartilage and proximal bone layers. Cartilage and bone marker staining along with specific matrix depositions reveal the effect of external cues on the hMSC differentiation. As a result of these studies a model system was developed to study and culture OC scaffolds in vitro.

Indexed as

ChondrogenesisOsteogenesisBiomarkersBone and BonesCartilageCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell SeparationExtracellular MatrixGlycosaminoglycansHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMesenchymal Stem CellsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiomarkersGlycosaminoglycansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylatechondrogenesisco-differentiation mediahuman mesenchymal stem cellmatrix stiffnessosteogenesispolymer-gel matrix

Identifiers

PMID28346796
PMCPMC5568178
OpenAlexW2606141198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.