Trial reportCancer2017
7-year follow-up after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase 2 clinical trial.
Trial report in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Elimination of PTV Margins Based on Online Adaptive Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Pulmonary Oligometastases: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study
Elimination of PTV Margins Based on Online Adaptive Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Prospective, Single-arm, Phase II Study
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chest wall toxicity after stereotactic radiation in early lung cancer: a systematic review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Pooled it
- Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy for early-stage or isolated lung parenchymal recurrent node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (revised STARS): long-term results of a single-arm, prospective trial with prespecified comparison to surgery.The Lancet. Oncology · 2021Trial
- Lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for medically operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A virtual randomized phase III trial stratified by age.Thoracic cancer · 2019Trial
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer using higher doses for larger tumors: results of the second study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Trial
- Robustness of Tumor Control Against Intrafraction Patient Motion in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Metastasectomy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data on overall and progression-free survival.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Salvage Resection for Local Failure after Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Malignancies: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.Journal of chest surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison among stereotactic body radiation therapy, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-driven immunosuppression is associated with poorer progression-free survival in cancer patients.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- The Effectiveness of SBRT for Solitary or Synchronous Multiple Pulmonary Nodules Suspicious of Early-Stage Lung Cancer Without Pathological Confirmation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Research Progress of SBRT Combined With Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.American journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Current evidence and ongoing trials for surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Comparison of surgical and radiotherapy outcomes in octogenarians with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER database retrospective cohort study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Establishing a prognostic scoring system and exploring prognostic value of examined lymph node numbers for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and a Chinese cohort.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Robotic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Results of an Interim Analysis.Cancers · 2024Article
- Effect of primary tumor volume on survival of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for multiple lung cancers in a patient with six primary cancers: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- ERJ Advances: interventional bronchoscopy.The European respiratory journal · 2024Article
- The dynamic duo: A narrative review on the synergy between stereotactic body radiotherapy and immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe authors evaluated the efficacy, patterns of failure, and toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients with medically inoperable, clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a prospective clinical trial with 7 years of follow-up. Clinical staging was performed according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system.
methodsEligible patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC of clinical stage I as determined using positron emission tomography staging were treated with SABR (50 grays in 4 fractions). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Patients were followed with computed tomography and/or positron emission tomography/computed tomography every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
resultsA total of 65 patients were eligible for analysis. The median age of the patients was 71 years, and the median follow-up was 7.2 years. A total of 18 patients (27.7%) developed disease recurrence at a median of 14.5 months (range, 4.3-71.5 months) after SABR. Estimated incidences of local, regional, and distant disease recurrence using competing risk analysis were 8.1%, 10.9%, and 11.0%, respectively, at 5 years and 8.1%, 13.6%, and 13.8%, respectively, at 7 years. A second primary lung carcinoma developed in 12 patients (18.5%) at a median of 35 months (range, 5-67 months) after SABR. Estimated 5-year and 7-year progression-free survival rates were 49.5% and 38.2%, respectively; the corresponding overall survival rates were 55.7% and 47.5%, respectively. Three patients (4.6%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. No patients developed grade 4 or 5 adverse events (toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]).
conclusionsWith long-term follow-up, the results of the current prospective study demonstrated outstanding local control and low toxicity after SABR in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. Regional disease recurrence and distant metastases were the dominant manifestations of failure. Surveillance for second primary lung carcinoma is recommended. Cancer 2017;123:3031-39. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.