ArticlePloS one2017
Gender differences in reward and punishment for monetary and social feedback in children: An ERP study.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reward positivity and affective functioning in early childhood: evidence from temporospatial principal components analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Effects of Teacher Rewards and Their Types on Preschool Children's Selective Trust.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Structure-function coupling within the reward network in preschool children predicts executive functioning in later childhood.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Relationship Match: the neural underpinnings of social feedback in romantic couples.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022Article
- Sex differences in neural responses to reward and the influences of individual reward and punishment sensitivity.BMC neuroscience · 2021Article
- Time of day differences in neural reward responsiveness in children.Psychophysiology · 2020Article
- Neural Responses to Reward in a Gambling Task: Sex Differences and Individual Variation in Reward-Driven Impulsivity.Cerebral cortex communications · 2020Article
- Event-related potentials in response to feedback following risk-taking in the hot version of the Columbia Card Task.Psychophysiology · 2019Article
- Children's Reward and Punishment Sensitivity Moderates the Association of Negative and Positive Parenting Behaviors in Child ADHD Symptoms.Journal of abnormal child psychology · 2018Article
- The relationship between responsiveness to social and monetary rewards and ADHD symptoms.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gender differences in feedback processing have been observed among adolescents and adults through event-related potentials. However, information on whether and how this feedback processing is affected by feedback valence, feedback type, and individual sensitivity in reward/punishment among children remains minimal. In this study, we used a guessing game task coupled with electroencephalography to investigate gender differences in feedback processing, in which feedback to reward and punishment was presented in the context of monetary and social conditions. Results showed that boys were less likely to switch their response after punishment, had generally less feedback-related negativity (FRN) amplitude, and longer FRN latency in monetary and punishment conditions than girls. Moreover, FRN for monetary punishment, which is related to individual difference in reward sensitivity, was observed only in girls. The study provides gender-specific evidence for the neural processing of feedback, which may offer educational guidance for appropriate feedback for girls and boys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.