Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28346468›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Endoluminal dilatation for embedded hemodialysis catheters: A case-control study of factors associated with embedding and clinical outcomes.

Hari Talreja, Stephen Edward Ryan, Janet Graham, Manish M Sood, Adnan Hadziomerovic, Edward Clark, Swapnil Hiremath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hari TalrejaDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen Edward RyanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Janet GrahamDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Manish M SoodDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Adnan HadziomerovicDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Edward ClarkDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Swapnil HiremathDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-3416
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing frequency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter use there is a parallel increase in the need for removal and/or exchange. A small but significant minority of catheters become embedded or 'stuck' and cannot be removed by traditional means. Management of embedded catheters involves cutting the catheter, burying the retained fragment with a subsequent increased risk of infections and thrombosis. Endoluminal dilatation may provide a potential safe and effective technique for removing embedded catheters, however, to date, there is a paucity of data.

objectives1) To determine factors associated with catheters becoming embedded and 2) to determine outcomes associated with endoluminal dilatation.

methodsAll patients with endoluminal dilatation for embedded catheters at our institution since Jan. 2010 were included. Patients who had an embedded catheter were matched 1:3 with patients with uncomplicated catheter removal. Baseline patient and catheter characteristics were compared. Outcomes included procedural success and procedure-related infection. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with embedded catheters.

resultsWe matched 15 cases of embedded tunneled catheters with 45 controls. Among patients with embedded catheters, there were no complications with endoluminal dilatation. Factors independently associated with embedded catheters included catheter dwell time (> 2 years) and history of central venous stenosis.

conclusionEmbedded catheters can be successfully managed by endoluminal dilatation with minimal complications and factors associated with embedding include dwell times > 2 years and/or with a history of central venous stenosis.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesCatheters, IndwellingDevice RemovalDilatationEquipment FailureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28346468
PMCPMC5367692
OpenAlexW2604058415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.