ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2017
Characterizing Health Care Utilization, Direct Costs, and Comorbidities Associated with Interstitial Cystitis: A Retrospective Claims Analysis.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biomarkers in the diagnosis and symptom assessment of patients with bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review.International urogynecology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Do medication prescription patterns follow guidelines in a cohort of women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome?Neurourology and urodynamics · 2022Article
- Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2022Review
- Hormonally Active Contraceptives, Part II: Sociological, Environmental, and Economic Impact.The Linacre quarterly · 2021Article
- Application of Low-Cost, Easy-to-Use, Portable Biosensor Systems for Diagnosing Bladder Dysfunctions.International neurourology journal · 2019Article
- Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy as a Complementary Alternative for Chronic Pelvic Pain Management in an Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Patient.Case reports in urology · 2019Article
- Correlates of Health Care Seeking Activities in Patients with Urological Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndromes: Findings from the MAPP Cohort.The Journal of urology · 2018Article
- Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist as a novel treatment for interstitial cystitis: A rat model.Investigative and clinical urology · 2018Article
- Morbidity rate and medical utilization in interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome.International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
- Recent advances in imaging and understanding interstitial cystitis.F1000Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial cystitis (IC) is a debilitating condition that affects up to 5% of the U.S. POPULATION: This condition is characterized by bladder pain, urinary urgency and frequency, nocturia, and, in some patients, bladder lesions called Hunner's lesions (HL). IC patients who have HL experience a clinical course that is distinct from those without HL and, as a result, respond differently to existing treatments. Without effective and lasting therapeutic options, IC patients are expected to experience a reduced quality of life and be a significant economic burden. Previous research describing the burden of IC is not only outdated but lacks stratification by HL.
objectivesTo (a) characterize health care utilization, direct costs, and comorbidities associated with IC and (b) elucidate differences between patients with and without HL.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using health care claims from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Adults with an incident IC diagnosis between 2009 and 2014 were identified and matched 1:4 to non-IC patients on age, gender, and geographic region. Health care utilization, direct costs, and comorbidities during the first 12 months after diagnosis were compared between the 2 groups, as well as between IC subgroups with and without HL. Associations were evaluated after adjustment for potential confounders using regression models.
resultsA total of 24,836 IC patients were identified and matched to 99,344 non-IC patients. Patients were predominantly female (92%), with a mean age of 49.0 (SD = 15.3) years. IC patients used significantly more health care resources across all categories compared with non-IC patients. On average, having IC was associated with $7,223 higher total health care costs than not having IC (95% CI = $6,650-$7,796), with outpatient costs contributing to 71% of the difference, after adjusting for baseline age, gender, region, insurance type, plan type, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. The odds of developing select comorbidities were 2.61 times greater in IC patients compared with non-IC patients (95% CI = 2.52-2.70), adjusting for baseline age, sex, region, and CCI score. Among IC patients, the HL subgroup (n = 292) used more health care resources, and having HL was associated with $6,895 higher total health care costs compared with not having HL (95% CI = $3,770-$10,020) after adjusting for baseline age, gender, region, insurance type, and plan type.
conclusionsFindings suggest that patients with IC have significantly higher health care utilization, costs, and comorbidities compared with non-IC patients. This economic burden is further amplified in those with HL. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was contributed by Allergan. Tung was supported by a training grant from Allergan at the time of this study. Hepp was an Allergan employee at the time this study was conducted. The other authors have nothing to disclose. This research was previously presented, in part, as a poster presentation at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 21st Annual International Meeting; Washington, DC; May 23, 2016. Study concept and design were primarily contributed by Hepp, along with Tung and Devine. Tung took the lead in data collection, with assistance from Hepp, and data interpretation was performed by Tung, along with Bansal and Devine. The manuscript was prepared primarily by Tung, along with Devine, Bansal, and Hepp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.