Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28345324›Full record

ReviewAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2017

Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity; Protective Supplements and Gender Differences

Mehdi Nematbakhsh, Zahra Pezeshki, Fatemeh Eshraghi Jazi, Bahar Mazaheri, Maryam Moeini, Tahereh Safari, Fariba Azarkish, Fatemeh Moslemi, Maryam Maleki, Alireza Rezaei and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Mehdi NematbakhshWater and Electrolytes Research Center, Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. *Email: nematbakhsh@med.mui.ac.ir
Zahra Pezeshki
Fatemeh Eshraghi Jazi
Bahar Mazaheri
Maryam Moeini
Tahereh Safari
Fariba Azarkish
Fatemeh Moslemi
Maryam Maleki
Alireza Rezaei
Shadan Saberi
Aghdas Dehghani
Maryam Malek
Azam Mansouri
Marzieh Ghasemi
Farzaneh Zeinali
Zohreh Zamani
Mitra Navidi
Sima Jilanchi
Soheyla Shirdavani
Farzaneh Ashrafi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin (CDDP) has been widely used as a chemotherapeutic agent for solid tumors. The most common side effect of CDDP is nephrotoxicity, and many efforts have been made in the laboratory and the clinic to employ candidate adjuvants to CDDP to minimize this adverse influence. Many synthetic and herbal antioxidants as well as trace elements have been investigated for this purpose in recent years and a variety of positive and negative results have been yielded. However, no definitive supplement has so far been proposed to prevent CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity; however, this condition is gender related and the sex hormone estrogen may protect the kidney against CDDP damage. In this review, the results of research related to the effect of different synthetic and herbal antioxidants supplements are presented and discussed with suggestions included for future work.

Indexed as

antioxidantCisplatingenderherbal agentsnephrotoxicitytrace elements

Identifiers

PMID28345324
PMCPMC5454720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.