Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28345062›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2016

Secondary structure propensity and chirality of the amyloidophilic peptide p5 and its analogues impacts ligand binding -

Jonathan S Wall, Angela Williams, Craig Wooliver, Emily B Martin, Xiaolin Cheng, R Eric Heidel, Stephen J Kennel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Probing the structural requirements of polybasic peptides for effective and specific amyloid reactivity.Amyloid : the international journal of experimental and clinical investigation : the official journal of the International Society of Amyloidosis · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan S WallDepartments of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA; Departments of Radiology, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Angela WilliamsDepartments of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Craig WooliverDepartments of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Emily B MartinDepartments of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Xiaolin ChengCenter for Molecular Biophysics, Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
R Eric HeidelDepartments of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Stephen J KennelDepartments of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA; Departments of Radiology, University of Tennessee, Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Funding

Preclinical Diagnostic Imaging of AmyloidR01DK079984 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI WALL, JONATHAN S · 2009 to 2016
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolybasic helical peptides, such as peptide p5, bind human amyloid extracts and synthetic amyloid fibrils. When radiolabeled, peptide p5 has been shown to specifically bind amyloid

methodsPeptide-ligand interactions were studied using CD spectroscopy and solution-phase binding assays with radiolabeled p5 analogs. The interaction of a subset of peptides was further studied by using molecular dynamics simulations.

resultsDisruption of the peptide helical structure reduced peptide binding to heparin and human amyloid extracts. The all-D enantiomer and the β-sheet-structured peptide bound all substrates as well as, or better than, p5. The interaction of helical and β-sheet structured peptides with Aβ fibrils was modeled and shown to involve both ionic and non-ionic interactions.

conclusionsThe α-helical secondary structure of peptide p5 is important for heparin and amyloid binding; however, helicity is not an absolute requirement as evidenced by the superior reactivity of a β-sheet peptide. The differential binding of the peptides with heparin and amyloid fibrils suggests that these molecular interactions are different. The all-D enantiomer of p5 and the β-sheet peptide are candidates for amyloid targeting reagents GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Efficient binding of polybasic peptides with amyloid is dependent on the linearity of charge spacing in the context of an α-helical secondary structure. Peptides with an α-helix or β-sheet propensity and with similar alignment of basic residues is optimal.

Indexed as

amino acid spacingAmyloid bindingCDHeparinMolecular dynamicsPolybasic peptides

Identifiers

PMID28345062
PMCPMC5363963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.