Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28345039›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

Female brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice.

Alberto Corral-López, Natasha I Bloch, Alexander Kotrschal, Wouter van der Bijl, Severine D Buechel, Judith E Mank, Niclas Kolm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial selection on brain size leads to matching changes in overall number of neurons.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Environmentally induced changes to brain morphology predict cognitive performance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto Corral-LópezDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 18B, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7784-0209
Natasha I BlochDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4769-1027
Alexander KotrschalDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 18B, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3473-1402
Wouter van der BijlDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 18B, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7366-1868
Severine D BuechelDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 18B, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Niclas KolmDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 18B, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate choice decisions are central in sexual selection theory aimed to understand how sexual traits evolve and their role in evolutionary diversification. We test the hypothesis that brain size and cognitive ability are important for accurate assessment of partner quality and that variation in brain size and cognitive ability underlies variation in mate choice. We compared sexual preference in guppy female lines selected for divergence in relative brain size, which we have previously shown to have substantial differences in cognitive ability. In a dichotomous choice test, large-brained and wild-type females showed strong preference for males with color traits that predict attractiveness in this species. In contrast, small-brained females showed no preference for males with these traits. In-depth analysis of optomotor response to color cues and gene expression of key opsins in the eye revealed that the observed differences were not due to differences in visual perception of color, indicating that differences in the ability to process indicators of attractiveness are responsible. We thus provide the first experimental support that individual variation in brain size affects mate choice decisions and conclude that differences in cognitive ability may be an important underlying mechanism behind variation in female mate choice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCognitionColor PerceptionFemaleMaleMating Preference, AnimalOrgan SizePoeciliaQuantitative Trait, Heritablebrain sizecognitive abilityfemale choiceguppiesmaintenance of variationPoecilia reticulatarational choiceSexual selection

Identifiers

PMID28345039
PMCPMC5362185
OpenAlexW2599521299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.