ArticleMolecular therapy oncolytics2017
Bacterial Carriers for Glioblastoma Therapy.
Article in Molecular therapy oncolytics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Possible Applications of Azurin, a Copper-Containing Protein, in Cancer Treatment: Prospects and Challenges.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- Brain-targeting drug delivery systems: The state of the art in treatment of glioblastoma.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Precision tumor treatment utilizing bacteria: principles and future perspectives.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The Potential of Nano Pharmaceuticals to Change the Paradigm of Brain Tumor Therapy: A State-of-the-art Review.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Review
- Innovative nanoparticle-based therapeutic strategies against glioblastoma multiform: a focus on enhanced delivery systems and efficacy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Tumor-Homing Peptides as Crucial Component of Magnetic-Based Delivery Systems: Recent Developments and Pharmacoeconomical Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Combinational Strategies for Overcoming the Blood-Brain Barrier and Blood-Tumor Barrier.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Combination of bacterial-targeted delivery of gold-based AIEgen radiosensitizer for fluorescence-image-guided enhanced radio-immunotherapy against advanced cancer.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Cross-talk between cancer and Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediates tumor suppression.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Emerging nanomedical strategies for direct targeting of pediatric and adult diffuse gliomas.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Advances in local therapy for glioblastoma - taking the fight to the tumour.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2022Review
- Application of Proteomics in Cancer: Recent Trends and Approaches for Biomarkers Discovery.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Innovative Approaches of Engineering Tumor-Targeting Bacteria with Different Therapeutic Payloads to Fight Cancer: A Smart Strategy of Disease Management.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Review
- Anticancer Actions of Azurin and Its Derived Peptide p28.The protein journal · 2020Review
- Peptidylarginine Deiminase Isozyme-Specific PAD2, PAD3 and PAD4 Inhibitors Differentially Modulate Extracellular Vesicle Signatures and Cell Invasion in Two Glioblastoma Multiforme Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Comparison of Alterations in miRNA Expression in Matched Tissue and Blood Samples during Spinal Cord Glioma Progression.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Engineering Controlled Peritumoral Inflammation to Constrain Brain Tumor Growth.Advanced healthcare materials · 2019Article
- Bacteria in Cancer Therapeutics: A Framework for Effective Therapeutic Bacterial Screening and Identification.Journal of Cancer · 2019Review
- Bacterial cupredoxin azurin hijacks cellular signaling networks: Protein-protein interactions and cancer therapy.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017Review
- Engineering challenges for brain tumor immunotherapy.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment of aggressive glioblastoma brain tumors is challenging, largely due to diffusion barriers preventing efficient drug dosing to tumors. To overcome these barriers, bacterial carriers that are actively motile and programmed to migrate and localize to tumor zones were designed. These carriers can induce apoptosis via hypoxia-controlled expression of a tumor suppressor protein p53 and a pro-apoptotic drug, Azurin. In a xenograft model of human glioblastoma in rats, bacterial carrier therapy conferred a significant survival benefit with 19% overall long-term survival of >100 days in treated animals relative to a median survival of 26 days in control untreated animals. Histological and proteomic analyses were performed to elucidate the safety and efficacy of these carriers, showing an absence of systemic toxicity and a restored neural environment in treated responders. In the treated non-responders, proteomic analysis revealed competing mechanisms of pro-apoptotic and drug-resistant activity. This bacterial carrier opens a versatile avenue to overcome diffusion barriers in glioblastoma by virtue of its active motility in extracellular space and can lead to tailored therapies via tumor-specific expression of tumoricidal proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.