Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28345007›Full record

ArticleStructural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)2017

Partial-occupancy binders identified by the Pan-Dataset Density Analysis method offer new chemical opportunities and reveal cryptic binding sites.

Nicholas M Pearce, Anthony R Bradley, Tobias Krojer, Brian D Marsden, Charlotte M Deane, Frank von Delft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Guest-protein incorporation into solvent channels of a protein host crystal (hostal).Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Protein X-ray Crystallography and Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas M Pearce
Anthony R BradleyStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford , Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
Tobias KrojerStructural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford , Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
Brian D Marsden
Charlotte M DeaneDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford , 24-29 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3LB, United Kingdom.
Frank von Delft

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystallographic fragment screening uses low molecular weight compounds to probe the protein surface and although individual protein-fragment interactions are high quality, fragments commonly bind at low occupancy, historically making identification difficult. However, our new Pan-Dataset Density Analysis method readily identifies binders missed by conventional analysis: for fragment screening data of lysine-specific demethylase 4D (KDM4D), the hit rate increased from 0.9% to 10.6%. Previously unidentified fragments reveal multiple binding sites and demonstrate: the versatility of crystallographic fragment screening; that surprisingly large conformational changes are possible in crystals; and that low crystallographic occupancy does not by itself reflect a protein-ligand complex's significance.

Identifiers

PMID28345007
PMCPMC5336473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.