Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28344977›Full record

ArticleSeparations2016

Chromatographic Studies of Protein-Based Chiral Separations.

Cong Bi, Xiwei Zheng, Shiden Azaria, Sandya Beeram, Zhao Li, David S Hage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Separations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Affinity chromatography: A review of trends and developments over the past 50 years.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cong BiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
Xiwei ZhengDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
Shiden AzariaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
Sandya BeeramDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
Zhao LiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
David S HageDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.

Funding

CHROMATOGRAPHIC AUTOMATION OF IMMUNOASSAYSR01GM044931 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HAGE, DAVID S · 1998 to 2014
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of separation methods for the analysis and resolution of chiral drugs and solutes has been an area of ongoing interest in pharmaceutical research. The use of proteins as chiral binding agents in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been an approach that has received particular attention in such work. This report provides an overview of proteins that have been used as binding agents to create chiral stationary phases (CSPs) and in the use of chromatographic methods to study these materials and protein-based chiral separations. The supports and methods that have been employed to prepare protein-based CSPs will also be discussed and compared. Specific types of CSPs that are considered include those that employ serum transport proteins (e.g., human serum albumin, bovine serum albumin, and alpha

Indexed as

chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)chiral recognitionchromatographic studies of drug-protein interactionsfrontal analysisprotein-based chiral stationary phaseszonal elution

Identifiers

PMID28344977
PMCPMC5363960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.