Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28344819›Full record

ReviewMilitary Medical Research2017

Olfaction as a soldier-- a review of the physiology and its present and future use in the military.

Palaniappan Ganesh Nagappan, Somasundram Subramaniam, De-Yun Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Military Medical Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Influencing factors of olfactory impairment in OSA and construction of nomogram prediction model].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Aromas Influencing the GABAergic System.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. Olfactory Performance among Hospital Residents.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2022
    Article
  4. Anosmia: A review in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 and orofacial pain.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Impact of malodour on health-related quality of life of patients with chronic wounds due to volatile organic compounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Palaniappan Ganesh NagappanSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Somasundram SubramaniamDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
De-Yun WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SGUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfaction is one of our 5 main qualitative sensory abilities. In this review, we have examined the physiology of olfaction from the olfactory receptor to the brain. Through analyzing the physiology of olfaction, we have found that the biochemistry of olfactory nerve stimulation is unique from that of other similar pathways. Upon receiving large amounts of input from the olfactory nerve, the olfactory bulb, followed by several layers of centrifugal and centripetal processing in the brain, has to sort the information from the input as well as integrate it with other inputs from the brain to develop a coherent understanding of the input. We then examined the implications of olfaction in the military, the practical applications of electronic noses and problems associated with injury to olfaction that could affect compensation and combat worthiness of a soldier following injury. In the military, olfaction can allow the army to perform at its best through 4 main methods, namely ensuring olfaction is consistent with other dimensions of perception (ensuring optimal olfaction ability in all soldiers in combat), understanding the impact of different common combat environments on the sense of smell, utilizing odor as a defense mechanism and using olfactory aids when necessary. Electronic noses are olfactory aids that have a large potential in the military ranging from saving lives through the detection of explosives to potential methods for improving combustion efficiency. There are several problems associated with injury to olfaction that should be considered when deciding on compensation and combat worthiness of the soldier following an injury.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOdorantsPerceptionReceptors, OdorantSmellReceptors, OdorantCombatCompensationElectronic noseInjuryMilitaryOlfactionPhysiology

Identifiers

PMID28344819
PMCPMC5359863
OpenAlexW2601722145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.