Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28344745›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2017

Can molecular biomarkers replace a clinical risk score for resectable colorectal liver metastasis?

Torhild Veen, Kjetil Søreide

Open access · hybridAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mini-invasiveWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Torhild VeenTorhild Veen, Kjetil Søreide, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, HPB Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway.
Kjetil SøreideTorhild Veen, Kjetil Søreide, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, HPB Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) the role and use of molecular biomarkers is still controversial. Several biomarkers have been linked to clinical outcomes in CRLM, but none have so far become routine for clinical decision making. For several reasons, the clinical risk score appears to no longer hold the same predictive value. Some of the reasons include the ever expanding indications for liver resection, which now increasingly tend to involve extrahepatic disease, such as lung metastases (both resectable and non-resectable) and the shift in indication from "what is taken out" (

Indexed as

Circulating tumor cellColorectal cancerDisease-free survivalKRASLiver metastasisLiver surgeryMolecular biomarkersOverall survival

Identifiers

PMID28344745
PMCPMC5348630
OpenAlexW2591861689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.