Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28344647›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2017

Ternary ionic liquid-water pretreatment systems of an agave bagasse and municipal solid waste blend.

Jose A Perez-Pimienta, Noppadon Sathitsuksanoh, Vicki S Thompson, Kim Tran, Teresa Ponce-Noyola, Vitalie Stavila, Seema Singh, Blake A Simmons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose A Perez-PimientaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Tepic, Mexico.
Noppadon SathitsuksanohDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Conn Center for Renewable Energy Research, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY USA.
Vicki S ThompsonBiological and Chemical Processing Department, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID USA.
Kim TranBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA.
Teresa Ponce-NoyolaDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, CINVESTAV-IPN, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Vitalie StavilaEnergy Nanomaterials Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA USA.
Seema SinghBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA.
Blake A SimmonsBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA.
Sandia National Laboratories California · USCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXIdaho National Laboratory · USJoint BioEnergy Institute · USUniversidad Autónoma de Nayarit · MXUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPretreatment is necessary to reduce biomass recalcitrance and enhance the efficiency of enzymatic saccharification for biofuel production. Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment has gained a significant interest as a pretreatment process that can reduce cellulose crystallinity and remove lignin, key factors that govern enzyme accessibility. There are several challenges that need to be addressed for IL pretreatment to become viable for commercialization, including IL cost and recyclability. In addition, it is unclear whether ILs can maintain process performance when utilizing low-cost, low-quality biomass feedstocks such as the paper fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW), which are readily available in high quantities. One approach to potentially reduce IL cost is to use a blend of ILs at different concentrations in aqueous mixtures. Herein, we describe 14 IL-water systems with mixtures of 1-ethyl-3-ethylimidazolium acetate ([C

resultsBoth biomass types (AGB and MSW) were efficiently disrupted by IL pretreatment. The pretreatment efficiency of [C

conclusionsOur results demonstrated that mixing ILs such as [C

Indexed as

Agave bagasseBiomass blendBiomass pretreatmentIL recyclingIonic liquidMunicipal solid wasteTernary system

Identifiers

PMID28344647
PMCPMC5361851
OpenAlexW2597662455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.