Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28344519›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2017

Assessment of REPLI-g Multiple Displacement Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Techniques for Metagenomic Applications.

Sofia Ahsanuddin, Ebrahim Afshinnekoo, Jorge Gandara, Mustafa Hakyemezoğlu, Daniela Bezdan, Samuel Minot, Nick Greenfield, Christopher E Mason

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strain-level dissection of complex rhizoplane and soil bacterial communities using single-cell genomics and metagenomics.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2017
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia AhsanuddinDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Ebrahim AfshinnekooDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Jorge GandaraDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Mustafa HakyemezoğluDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Daniela BezdanDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Samuel MinotOne Codex, San Francisco, California, USA; and.
Nick GreenfieldOne Codex, San Francisco, California, USA; and.
Christopher E MasonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA;; Feil Family Brain & Mind Research Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Cornell University · USCodexis (United States) · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Epigenome Interactions in Complex Neurogenetic DisordersR01NS076465 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MASON, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD, ROSS, MARGARET ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2015
$5.8M
Defining the role of the RNA modification N6-methyladenosine in the hepatitis C virus lifecycleR01AI125416 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Stacy Michelle Horner · 2016 to 2026
$5.5M
Study of Neural Tube Defects Etiology: Genome and ExposomeR01ES021006 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FINNELL, RICHARD H., MASON, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD · 2012 to 2014
$1.0M
Community Research Education and Engagement for Data Science (CREEDS)R25EB020393 · NIBIB · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CLAUDIO, LUZ, KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2015 to 2017
$578k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125416NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB020393NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021006NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplification of minute quantities of DNA is a fundamental challenge in low-biomass metagenomic and microbiome studies because of potential biases in coverage, guanine-cytosine (GC) content, and altered species abundances. Whole genome amplification (WGA), although widely used, is notorious for introducing artifact sequences, either by amplifying laboratory contaminants or by nonrandom amplification of a sample's DNA. In this study, we investigate the effect of REPLI-g multiple displacement amplification (MDA; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) on sequencing data quality and species abundance detection in 8 paired metagenomic samples and 1 titrated, mixed control sample. We extracted and sequenced genomic DNA (gDNA) from 8 environmental samples and compared the quality of the sequencing data for the MDA and their corresponding non-MDA samples. The degree of REPLI-g MDA bias was evaluated by sequence metrics, species composition, and cross-validating observed species abundance and species diversity estimates using the One Codex and MetaPhlAn taxonomic classification tools. Here, we provide evidence of the overall efficacy of REPLI-g MDA on retaining sequencing data quality and species abundance measurements while providing increased yields of high-fidelity DNA. We find that species abundance estimates are largely consistent across samples, even with REPLI-g amplification, as demonstrated by the Spearman's rank order coefficient (R

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyBase CompositionDNA, BacterialGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterialjackpot effectmetagenomicsnext-generation sequencingREPLI-gwhole genome amplification

Identifiers

PMID28344519
PMCPMC5363268
OpenAlexW2602820708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.