ArticleVeterinary world2017
Article in Veterinary world, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infectious and parasitic diseases of poultry in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Poultry science · 2019Pooled it
- Epidemiology of canine gastrointestinal helminths in sub-Saharan Africa.Parasites & vectors · 2018Pooled it
- Seroprevalence and associated risk factors ofVeterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Public health significance of prevalence and risk factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in goats sampled from two quarantine facilities and an institutional farm in Maiduguri metropolis, Borno state, Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Seroprevalence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in sheep, goat, cattle, and buffaloes in Baghdad, Iraq.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- First Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Serological and molecular survey of Toxoplasma Gondii in aborted livestock fetuses from Northeast Iran.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Molecular evidence ofItalian journal of food safety · 2024Article
- An investigation into Toxoplasma gondii at the human-livestock-wildlife interface, South Africa.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2024Article
- Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii in sheep and goats of North West Province, South Africa.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Low Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular prevalence and genetic diversity ofOpen veterinary journal · 2023Article
- Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women and detection of infection acquired during pregnancy in Cotonou, Benin.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2023Article
- Zoonotic diseases transmitted from the camels.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Assessment of Geographical Distribution of Emerging ZoonoticTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Seroprevalence and risk assessment ofVeterinary world · 2022Article
- Prospective cohort study reveals unexpected aetiologies of livestock abortion in northern Tanzania.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimMATERIALS AND
methodsFour databases were used to search seroepidemiological data on the prevalence of anti-
resultsA total of 30,742 individual samples from 24 countries, described in 68 articles were studied. The overall estimated prevalence for toxoplasmosis in chicken, camel, cattle, sheep, goat, pig were 37.4% (29.2-46.0%), 36% (18-56%), 12% (8-17%), 26.1% (17.0-37.0%), 22.9% (12.3-36.0%), and 26.0% (20-32.0%), respectively. Moreover, major risk factor of infection was age, farming system, and farm location.
conclusionsA significant variation in the seroepidemiological data was observed within each species and country. The results can aid in an updated epidemiological analysis but also can be used as an important input in quantitative microbial risk assessment models. Further studies are required for a better and continual evaluation of the occurrence of this zoonotic infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.