Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28344019›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2017

Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.

Rohit Tejwani, Brian J Young, Hsin-Hsiao S Wang, Steven Wolf, J Todd Purves, John S Wiener, Jonathan C Routh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rohit TejwaniDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Brian J YoungDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Hsin-Hsiao S WangDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Steven WolfDept of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Todd PurvesDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
John S WienerDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jonathan C RouthDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.routh@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatments in ChildrenK08DK100534 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROUTH, JONATHAN C · 2014 to 2018
$671k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK100534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are anecdotally reported to be increasingly used, but little objective data supports this. Our objective was to assess trends in MIS utilization across various procedures in pediatric urology and to compare postoperative complication rates between MIS and open procedures.

methodsWe analyzed the 1998-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified children (<18 years old) undergoing open and MIS inpatient procedures and any in-hospital post-operative complications that occurred during that postoperative hospitalization. We utilized propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding factors.

resultsWe identified 163,838 weighted encounters in the "overall cohort," 70,273 of which were at centers performing more than five MIS procedures over the years studied. Use of MIS techniques increased significantly over time for several procedures, most prominently for nephrectomy (Fig.). The overall rate of complications was lower in patients undergoing MIS compared with open surgery (6% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Specialized centers had a significantly lower overall rate of complications than unspecialized centers (9% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Within specialized centers, MIS had lower complication rates than open procedures (7% vs. 9%, p < 0.001); this finding was consistent even after adjusting for other factors (OR 0.71, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Limitations include that these data may not be generalizable to encounters not in the sample pool. As a large, retrospective, administrative database, NIS may be affected by miscoding bias - rendering our analysis sensitive to the accuracy of procedure coding in NIS. Although the accuracy level of NIS is high for an administrative database, it is possible at least some portion of our cohort may be incorrectly coded. Further, the NSQIP complications we identified may represent associated comorbidities and not true postoperative complications, as NIS does not provide temporal relationships between different diagnosis codes. Despite these limitations, we note that the NIS database is rigorously monitored and audited for coding accuracy and, therefore, represents a reasonably reliable panorama of the characteristics of an inpatient surgical cohort. However, it is important to note that the choice of operative modality is, undoubtedly, multifactorial and patient/setting-specific.

conclusionsThere is increasing use of MIS for pediatric urology procedures, although utilization rates vary among procedures. MIS was associated with a lower postoperative complication rate than for open procedures. Higher-volume MIS centers have a lower complication rate than lower-volume centers.

Indexed as

ChildFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUrologic Surgical ProceduresComplicationsLaparoscopic surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryPediatricsUrology

Identifiers

PMID28344019
PMCPMC5483194
OpenAlexW2591015823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.