Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28343909›Full record

ReviewSeminars in fetal & neonatal medicine2017

Pneumonia.

Thomas A Hooven, Richard A Polin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas A HoovenColumbia University, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Richard A PolinColumbia University, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: rap32@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal pneumonia may occur in isolation or as one component of a larger infectious process. Bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites are all potential causes of neonatal pneumonia, and may be transmitted vertically from the mother or acquired from the postnatal environment. The patient's age at the time of disease onset may help narrow the differential diagnosis, as different pathogens are associated with congenital, early-onset, and late-onset pneumonia. Supportive care and rationally selected antimicrobial therapy are the mainstays of treatment for neonatal pneumonia. The challenges involved in microbiological testing of the lower airways may prevent definitive identification of a causative organism. In this case, secondary data must guide selection of empiric therapy, and the response to treatment must be closely monitored.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineAdaptive ImmunityCombined Modality TherapyCross InfectionHumansImmunity, InnateInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPneumoniaPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsImmunityInfectionMultidrug resistancePulmonaryTORCH infectionVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID28343909
PMCPMC7270051
OpenAlexW4205481205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.