Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28343697›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2017

Modeling Avoidance in Mood and Anxiety Disorders Using Reinforcement Learning.

Anahit Mkrtchian, Jessica Aylward, Peter Dayan, Jonathan P Roiser, Oliver J Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural Bases of Affect-Based Impulsivity: A Decision Neuroscience Account.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anahit MkrtchianInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jessica AylwardInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver J RobinsonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: oliver.j.robinson@gmail.com.
University College London · GBOxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerious and debilitating symptoms of anxiety are the most common mental health problem worldwide, accounting for around 5% of all adult years lived with disability in the developed world. Avoidance behavior-avoiding social situations for fear of embarrassment, for instance-is a core feature of such anxiety. However, as for many other psychiatric symptoms the biological mechanisms underlying avoidance remain unclear.

methodsReinforcement learning models provide formal and testable characterizations of the mechanisms of decision making; here, we examine avoidance in these terms. A total of 101 healthy participants and individuals with mood and anxiety disorders completed an approach-avoidance go/no-go task under stress induced by threat of unpredictable shock.

resultsWe show an increased reliance in the mood and anxiety group on a parameter of our reinforcement learning model that characterizes a prepotent (pavlovian) bias to withhold responding in the face of negative outcomes. This was particularly the case when the mood and anxiety group was under stress.

conclusionsThis formal description of avoidance within the reinforcement learning framework provides a new means of linking clinical symptoms with biophysically plausible models of neural circuitry and, as such, takes us closer to a mechanistic understanding of mood and anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultAnxietyAvoidance LearningBayes TheoremDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalMood DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesYoung AdultAnxietyAvoidanceDiathesis–stressPavlovian biasReinforcement learningThreat of shock

Identifiers

PMID28343697
PMCPMC5598542
OpenAlexW2587263457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.