Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28343352›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2017

The Role of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.

Linus C Benjamin, Alison C Tree, David P Dearnaley

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05120947 (A Phase I Study of Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Resected Head and Neck Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05120947 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I Study of Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Resected Head and Neck Cancers (HART-HN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2021 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsResectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaArms42 Gy Radiation Therapy, 39 Gy Radiation Therapy, 32.5 Gy Radiation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility of longitudinal prostate RPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Moderately HRT vs. CRT for localized prostate cancer using image-guided VMAT with SIB: evaluation of acute and late toxicities.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  18. Automatic reconstruction of the delivered dose of the day using MR-linac treatment log files and online MR imaging.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linus C BenjaminDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton Surrey, SM2 5PT, London, UK.
Alison C TreeDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton Surrey, SM2 5PT, London, UK.
David P DearnaleyDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton Surrey, SM2 5PT, London, UK. David.Dearnaley@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10588Cancer Research UK 12518Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 7253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIt is now accepted that prostate cancer has a low alpha/beta ratio, establishing a strong basis for hypofractionation of prostate radiotherapy. This review focuses on the rationale for hypofractionation and presents the evidence base for establishing moderate hypofractionation for localised disease as the new standard of care. The emerging evidence for extreme hypofractionation in managing localized and oligometastatic prostate cancer is reviewed. RECENT

findingsThe 5-year efficacy and toxicity outcomes from four phase III studies have been published within the last 12 months. These studies randomizing over 6000 patients to conventional fractionation (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) or moderate hypofractionation (3.0-3.4 Gy per fraction). They demonstrate hypofractionation to be non-inferior to conventional fractionation. Moderate hypofractionation for localized prostate cancer is safe and effective. There is a growing body of evidence in support of extreme hypofractionation for localized prostate cancer. Extreme hypofractionation may have a role in managing prostate oligometastases, but further studies are needed.

Indexed as

HumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTreatment OutcomeCHHiPHypofractionationHYPROProstate cancerRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28343352
PMCPMC5366169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.