Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28343248›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2017

Uncovering specific changes in network wiring underlying the primate cerebrotype.

Salah Hamodeh, Ayse Bozkurt, Haian Mao, Fahad Sultan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Salah HamodehDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, HIH for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Ayse BozkurtDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, HIH for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Haian MaoDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, HIH for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Fahad SultanDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, HIH for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. fahad.sultan@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-9905
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG SU171.3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular scaling of brain networks during evolution has been proposed to be the major process leading to enlarged brains. Alternative views, however, suggest that deviations from regular scaling were crucial to the evolution of the primate brain and the emergence of different cerebrotypes. Here, we examined the scaling within the major link between the cerebellum and the cerebral cortex by studying the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN). We compared the major axonal and dendritic wiring in the DCN of rodents and monkeys in search of regular scaling. We were able to confirm regular scaling within the density of neurons, the general dendritic length per neuron and the Purkinje cell axon length. However, we also observed specific modification of the scaling rules within the primates' largest and phylogenetically newest DCN, the dentate nucleus (LN/dentate). Our analysis shows a deviation from regular scaling in the predicted dendritic length per neuron in the LN/dentate. This reduction in the dendritic length is also associated with a smaller dendritic region-of-influence of these neurons. We also detected specific changes in the dendritic diameter distribution, supporting the theory that there is a shift in the neuronal population of the LN/dentate towards neurons that exhibit spatially restricted, clustered branching trees. The smaller dendritic fields would enable a larger number of network modules to be accommodated in the primate LN/dentate and would provide an explanation for the unique folded structure of the primate LN/dentate. Our results show that, in some brain regions, connectivity maximization (i.e., an increase of dendritic fields) is not the sole optimum and that increases in the number of network modules may be important for the emergence of a divergent primate cerebrotype.

Indexed as

Species SpecificityAcetyltransferasesAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAxonsBrain MappingCerebellar NucleiCerebral CortexDendritesMacaca mulattaMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural PathwaysNeurogliaNeuronsPrinting, Three-DimensionalAcetyltransferasesmicrotubule-associated protein acetyltransferaseNerve Tissue ProteinsPurkinje cell protein L73D reconstructionsCerebellar nucleiComparative neuroanatomyDentate nucleusMotor systemsPurkinje cellsQuantitative immunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID28343248
PMCPMC5585288
OpenAlexW2603382809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.