Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28342878›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2017

3D printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds.

Laura G Bracaglia, Brandon T Smith, Emma Watson, Navein Arumugasaamy, Antonios G Mikos, John P Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura G BracagliaFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Brandon T SmithDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Emma WatsonDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Navein ArumugasaamyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Health System, Washington, D.C. 20010, USA.
Antonios G MikosDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: mikos@rice.edu.
John P FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: jpfisher@umd.edu.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
In Situ Hardening Cell-Laden Constructs for Osteochondral Tissue EngineeringR01AR068073 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Rapidly-Degrading Calcium Phosphate Cements for Orthopedic Tissue Engineering.F30AR071258 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, BRANDON · 2017 to 2020
$168k
Development of a Hybrid Material for a Tissue Engineered Strategy to Reconstruct the Vascular WallF31HL132541 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BRACAGLIA, LAURA · 2016 to 2016
$28k
NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL132541NIAMS NIH HHS F30 AR071258NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068073NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To accurately mimic the native tissue environment, tissue engineered scaffolds often need to have a highly controlled and varied display of three-dimensional (3D) architecture and geometrical cues. Additive manufacturing in tissue engineering has made possible the development of complex scaffolds that mimic the native tissue architectures. As such, architectural details that were previously unattainable or irreproducible can now be incorporated in an ordered and organized approach, further advancing the structural and chemical cues delivered to cells interacting with the scaffold. This control over the environment has given engineers the ability to unlock cellular machinery that is highly dependent upon the intricate heterogeneous environment of native tissue. Recent research into the incorporation of physical and chemical gradients within scaffolds indicates that integrating these features improves the function of a tissue engineered construct. This review covers recent advances on techniques to incorporate gradients into polymer scaffolds through additive manufacturing and evaluate the success of these techniques. As covered here, to best replicate different tissue types, one must be cognizant of the vastly different types of manufacturing techniques available to create these gradient scaffolds. We review the various types of additive manufacturing techniques that can be leveraged to fabricate scaffolds with heterogeneous properties and discuss methods to successfully characterize them. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Additive manufacturing techniques have given tissue engineers the ability to precisely recapitulate the native architecture present within tissue. In addition, these techniques can be leveraged to create scaffolds with both physical and chemical gradients. This work offers insight into several techniques that can be used to generate graded scaffolds, depending on the desired gradient. Furthermore, it outlines methods to determine if the designed gradient was achieved. This review will help to condense the abundance of information that has been published on the creation and characterization of gradient scaffolds and to provide a single review discussing both methods for manufacturing gradient scaffolds and evaluating the establishment of a gradient.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalPolymersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsPolymersAdditive manufacturingGradient scaffoldsRegenerative medicineScaffold fabricationTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28342878
PMCPMC5544968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.